How do you rank Wlad pound-for-pound?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ringlife
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 5861
    • 64
    • 49
    • 12,524

    #51
    Very weak division no good fighters for him to fight not his fault.

    Comment

    • RA-Box
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 1353
      • 96
      • 160
      • 16,710

      #52
      Wlad should be nowhere on the p4p list. Yeah he beat Haye, but how.. on a points win based completely on jabs.

      His size, reach and 2 punches (jab, cross) are all that he has.

      p4p, as in if he was the same size as other fighters, he'd be a bum.

      Vitali is the real deal in the Klitschko family.

      Comment

      • Kulle
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 206
        • 17
        • 0
        • 6,261

        #53
        Originally posted by KingOfBox
        True.... Perfect example... Thats why its called P4P....

        Skill-wise... If they were all the same size... who would be better...

        Wladimir shouldn't even be Top 20 right now. He is #5 based on merit and nothing else.
        Blah. If Pac/Floyd/whoever would be 6'7 and 250lbs, they would not be as "skilled" as they are now.

        They would have different skillsets, something similar to WK.

        Comment

        • Pirao
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 3867
          • 131
          • 439
          • 10,171

          #54
          Top 5, IMO. The RING has him at 5 too, right?

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP