Originally posted by brick wall
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd has turned the tables on Manny in their chessmatch
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostFuck the money, is a legit fight. A legit fight is not a "bad look"
GTFOH with that nonsense.
It's a mood point anyways. If Pac fights any young fighter. It will be against some one who has yet to prove himself like a Chavez Jr or Jones. Not a Timothy Bradley.
But, a Pacquiao-Bradley fight is just as legit if not more so than a Mayweather-Ortiz fight.
It seems manny makes most of his money on based on ppv's sold. I think its hard to sell that fight to get Manny an additional 14-17 mil so his take is 20-25 mil that he wants.
I think you disagree. Of course the fight is legitimate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ThePrince View PostHe didn't discredit him, he said that if Bradley joined Top Rank they would put a big media blitz on him and (re)introduce him to the public so he could be a viable PPV opponent for this fall or next spring (comments were made in Jan, so obviously the target is spring).
Featuring Bradley on the Pac-Marquez build up (like say a spot feature on Fight Camp like they did for Rios during the Pac-Margarito 24/7) and then putting him as the lead-in fight on the actual card would go a long way towards making him a known commodity and someone who can justify $20 mil guaranteed for Pac come Spring of '12.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostI wasn't saying the fight wasn;t legitimate, You got all hot then started posting. RELAX. For clarity, I don't know if Tim Bradley can generate the interest to get manny the payday he wants.
It seems manny makes most of his money on based on ppv's sold. I think its hard to sell that fight to get Manny an additional 14-17 mil so his take is 20-25 mil that he wants.
I think you disagree. Of course the fight is legitimate.
A fight like Pac-Bradley is not a "bad look"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Big Dunn View PostAgain I am more well read then perhaps you are willing to concede. Sorry but I don't have to get clearance from you to post something. Feel free to agree or disagree. Now you can question the accuracy of what I posted if you have a working knowledge I don not and I appreciate that. But be careful assuming that I would post something in a good discussion thread without having some knowledge.
who cares if you are well read than anyone else in this forum? right now you are the one who posted moronic statements and start crying when you got exposed. and what knowledge are you talking about? you can't even justify what you posted. just because you read a couple of reports you already call that knowledge? gtfoh.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostI couldn't careless if a Pac fights sells or not. Whether Pac-Bradley does 50k or a mili it doesn't matter to me. Because, I would prefer that fight over a Marg who did over a mili or a JMM who probably would do over a mili.
A fight like Pac-Bradley is not a "bad look"
Comment
-
Originally posted by jrosales13 View PostIs Pacquiao-Bradley legit, yes or no?
Manny needs to cut the BS, and Fight Floyd. No more passes.
Comment
-
anyone really complaining about a bradley vs. pac fight? Thats one of the 2-3 i wanted him to take instead of Marquez
(others being Ortiz and Martinez)
Comment
-
Originally posted by brick wall View Postwho cares if you are well read than anyone else in this forum? right now you are the one who posted moronic statements and start crying when you got exposed. and what knowledge are you talking about? you can't even justify what you posted. just because you read a couple of reports you already call that knowledge? gtfoh.
Justify it how. Perhaps you took it too literally. When you made it clear all politicians do that I said ok I learned something I didn't know.
And I never said I'm better or smarter or more well read than any other poster so get off thst BS.
Comment
Comment