Floyd has turned the tables on Manny in their chessmatch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Dunn
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 70604
    • 10,128
    • 8,315
    • 287,568

    #351
    Originally posted by brick wall
    just stick to boxing and don't get too far. Philippines and its people has nothing to do with the topic...don't go there. you can't represent any place and it's people without first hand information...only idiots would do that and i thought you're not.
    Again I am more well read then perhaps you are willing to concede. Sorry but I don't have to get clearance from you to post something. Feel free to agree or disagree. Now you can question the accuracy of what I posted if you have a working knowledge I don not and I appreciate that. But be careful assuming that I would post something in a good discussion thread without having some knowledge.

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #352
      Originally posted by Eastbay Giant
      He also said the same thing about Mosley, but we see what eventually happened. He's selling fights to Pacquiao fans based on perception and not reality.
      Is Pacquiao-Bradley legit, yes or no?

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 70604
        • 10,128
        • 8,315
        • 287,568

        #353
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        Fuck the money, is a legit fight. A legit fight is not a "bad look"

        GTFOH with that nonsense.

        It's a mood point anyways. If Pac fights any young fighter. It will be against some one who has yet to prove himself like a Chavez Jr or Jones. Not a Timothy Bradley.

        But, a Pacquiao-Bradley fight is just as legit if not more so than a Mayweather-Ortiz fight.
        I wasn't saying the fight wasn;t legitimate, You got all hot then started posting. RELAX. For clarity, I don't know if Tim Bradley can generate the interest to get manny the payday he wants.

        It seems manny makes most of his money on based on ppv's sold. I think its hard to sell that fight to get Manny an additional 14-17 mil so his take is 20-25 mil that he wants.

        I think you disagree. Of course the fight is legitimate.

        Comment

        • The Big Dunn
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 70604
          • 10,128
          • 8,315
          • 287,568

          #354
          Originally posted by ThePrince
          He didn't discredit him, he said that if Bradley joined Top Rank they would put a big media blitz on him and (re)introduce him to the public so he could be a viable PPV opponent for this fall or next spring (comments were made in Jan, so obviously the target is spring).

          Featuring Bradley on the Pac-Marquez build up (like say a spot feature on Fight Camp like they did for Rios during the Pac-Margarito 24/7) and then putting him as the lead-in fight on the actual card would go a long way towards making him a known commodity and someone who can justify $20 mil guaranteed for Pac come Spring of '12.
          Fair point. But who do they have him fight on the undercard?

          Comment

          • jrosales13
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 32632
            • 739
            • 763
            • 40,023

            #355
            Originally posted by Big Dunn
            I wasn't saying the fight wasn;t legitimate, You got all hot then started posting. RELAX. For clarity, I don't know if Tim Bradley can generate the interest to get manny the payday he wants.

            It seems manny makes most of his money on based on ppv's sold. I think its hard to sell that fight to get Manny an additional 14-17 mil so his take is 20-25 mil that he wants.

            I think you disagree. Of course the fight is legitimate.
            I couldn't careless if a Pac fights sells or not. Whether Pac-Bradley does 50k or a mili it doesn't matter to me. Because, I would prefer that fight over a Marg who did over a mili or a JMM who probably would do over a mili.

            A fight like Pac-Bradley is not a "bad look"

            Comment

            • brick wall
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 6480
              • 259
              • 35
              • 24,574

              #356
              Originally posted by Big Dunn
              Again I am more well read then perhaps you are willing to concede. Sorry but I don't have to get clearance from you to post something. Feel free to agree or disagree. Now you can question the accuracy of what I posted if you have a working knowledge I don not and I appreciate that. But be careful assuming that I would post something in a good discussion thread without having some knowledge.

              who cares if you are well read than anyone else in this forum? right now you are the one who posted moronic statements and start crying when you got exposed. and what knowledge are you talking about? you can't even justify what you posted. just because you read a couple of reports you already call that knowledge? gtfoh.

              Comment

              • The Big Dunn
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 70604
                • 10,128
                • 8,315
                • 287,568

                #357
                Originally posted by jrosales13
                I couldn't careless if a Pac fights sells or not. Whether Pac-Bradley does 50k or a mili it doesn't matter to me. Because, I would prefer that fight over a Marg who did over a mili or a JMM who probably would do over a mili.

                A fight like Pac-Bradley is not a "bad look"
                Of course its not, but is it profitable by current standards? Obviously bradley is a better opponent than the other 2 fights, but that is from a boxing standpoint. from a business standpoint its just different.

                Comment

                • Eastbay Giant
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 931
                  • 58
                  • 7
                  • 1,040

                  #358
                  Originally posted by jrosales13
                  Is Pacquiao-Bradley legit, yes or no?
                  No. Tim Bradley is a light punching JWW, who has no physical advantages over Manny and gets hit on the regular. Most importantly, he won't ask for WADA testing.

                  Manny needs to cut the BS, and Fight Floyd. No more passes.

                  Comment

                  • Barry Halls
                    Mi Vida Loca
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 4141
                    • 189
                    • 162
                    • 10,607

                    #359
                    anyone really complaining about a bradley vs. pac fight? Thats one of the 2-3 i wanted him to take instead of Marquez

                    (others being Ortiz and Martinez)

                    Comment

                    • The Big Dunn
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 70604
                      • 10,128
                      • 8,315
                      • 287,568

                      #360
                      Originally posted by brick wall
                      who cares if you are well read than anyone else in this forum? right now you are the one who posted moronic statements and start crying when you got exposed. and what knowledge are you talking about? you can't even justify what you posted. just because you read a couple of reports you already call that knowledge? gtfoh.
                      How did you expose me? Dude obviously manny didn't steal from the rich and give to the poor. its an analogy. Sometimes you are a real b1tch.

                      Justify it how. Perhaps you took it too literally. When you made it clear all politicians do that I said ok I learned something I didn't know.

                      And I never said I'm better or smarter or more well read than any other poster so get off thst BS.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP