team pacquiao doesnt have to PROVE anything

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingtech718v2
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 2836
    • 146
    • 108
    • 3,782

    #11
    Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
    *****s keep .......
    [IMG]http://i290.***********.com/albums/ll256/Rain_1/umad.gif[/IMG]

    Comment

    • champ_kw
      Interim Champion
      • May 2006
      • 511
      • 48
      • 0
      • 6,803

      #12
      Lupe Fiasco calls the POTUS a *********...he gets an invite to a talk show to discuss his reasoning. Pac get called out for possible PED usage...they hand out supoena's for court proceedings. I wish people realized how petty this all is. Just take the test or don't even bother talking about fighting the guy anymore.

      Comment

      • cixthree
        I love Manny Pacquaio
        • Nov 2008
        • 2221
        • 152
        • 0
        • 8,387

        #13
        Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
        *****s keep saying that defamation case is gonna get thrown out because team pac cant PROVE that the mayweathers slandered pac.

        Newsflash *****s. Its a civil suit. Nothing needs to be proven. The judge and/or jury only meed to be convinced whos side of the story is more likely, the plaintiff or defendants. And the way the mayweathers have all u morons convinced without a shadow of a doubt that pac is juicing team pacquiao has more than enough evidence to get a ruling.
        the Mayweathers don't have people convinced, it's Mannys refusal/excuses that have people questioning him....
        Fail

        Comment

        • deejd
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 3376
          • 88
          • 353
          • 10,029

          #14
          Originally posted by Rassclot
          hold on so you're not the ones rambling on ******ed sayings from the Mayweathers...


          "If you're the best take the test" X100000


          when Pac already agreed.



          wipe that drool from your face reject.
          He never agreed.

          Comment

          • deejd
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 3376
            • 88
            • 353
            • 10,029

            #15
            Originally posted by cixthree
            the Mayweathers don't have people convinced, it's Mannys refusal/excuses that have people questioning him....
            Fail
            Pretty much... if the case is really that serious, Mayweather should sue Michael Wilbon, Tony Kornheiser, Skip Bayless, and ESPN for calling him a coward and claiming that he's scared.

            But because he knows he isn't, why waste the money to take them to court?

            Comment

            • deejd
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 3376
              • 88
              • 353
              • 10,029

              #16
              Originally posted by champ_kw
              Lupe Fiasco calls the POTUS a *********...he gets an invite to a talk show to discuss his reasoning. Pac get called out for possible PED usage...they hand out supoena's for court proceedings. I wish people realized how petty this all is. Just take the test or don't even bother talking about fighting the guy anymore.
              Exactly, which is why the case will probably end up getting dismissed. It's 'he say/she say.'

              If the judge has any common sense, he'll ask why Pacquiao didn't want to go through random testing for $50 million.

              Also, Pacquiao insinuated that Mayweather was taking steroids as well in the same article that was published quoting Sr.'s initial assumptions. Once again, though, Mayweather didn't take it to the courtroom.

              Comment

              • 1nonlymre
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 627
                • 79
                • 3
                • 9,826

                #17
                Originally posted by Discipline
                If you're the best, take the test.
                "Easy diffuse, just don't accuse."


                See what I did there? Did you see that?
                I can be snarky too!

                Comment

                • Mayabang
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 3110
                  • 222
                  • 85
                  • 9,722

                  #18

                  Comment

                  • j.one
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 1544
                    • 81
                    • 82
                    • 7,763

                    #19
                    Manny has to prove actual damages, as in how much money the comments cost him.

                    Comment

                    • 1nonlymre
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 627
                      • 79
                      • 3
                      • 9,826

                      #20
                      Originally posted by davis828
                      Exactly, which is why the case will probably end up getting dismissed. It's 'he say/she say.'

                      If the judge has any common sense, he'll ask why Pacquiao didn't want to go through random testing for $50 million.

                      Also, Pacquiao insinuated that Mayweather was taking steroids as well in the same article that was published quoting Sr.'s initial assumptions. Once again, though, Mayweather didn't take it to the courtroom.
                      You don't argue an implication with another implication. That makes no sense whatsoever.

                      The question is if pacquiao initially refused the blood testing. If the answer is yes, the next logical question would be 'why'? A logical answer would be because the boxing commission does not ask for such a test, and pacquiao adheres to only the tests required by the commission.

                      Asking about the $50million potential for the fight and negating that would imply that pacquiao was hiding something. Its a leading question and not one a judge would rightfully ask.

                      We need to realize that the money generated for this fight is much greater to us common folks than it is to the boxers who generate millions anyway.

                      it's therefore easy to take a figure like $50 million and think that everybody has a price (Million Dollar Man and Virgil reference).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP