team pacquiao doesnt have to PROVE anything
Collapse
-
-
Lupe Fiasco calls the POTUS a *********...he gets an invite to a talk show to discuss his reasoning. Pac get called out for possible PED usage...they hand out supoena's for court proceedings. I wish people realized how petty this all is. Just take the test or don't even bother talking about fighting the guy anymore.Comment
-
the Mayweathers don't have people convinced, it's Mannys refusal/excuses that have people questioning him....*****s keep saying that defamation case is gonna get thrown out because team pac cant PROVE that the mayweathers slandered pac.
Newsflash *****s. Its a civil suit. Nothing needs to be proven. The judge and/or jury only meed to be convinced whos side of the story is more likely, the plaintiff or defendants. And the way the mayweathers have all u morons convinced without a shadow of a doubt that pac is juicing team pacquiao has more than enough evidence to get a ruling.
FailComment
-
Comment
-
Pretty much... if the case is really that serious, Mayweather should sue Michael Wilbon, Tony Kornheiser, Skip Bayless, and ESPN for calling him a coward and claiming that he's scared.
But because he knows he isn't, why waste the money to take them to court?Comment
-
Exactly, which is why the case will probably end up getting dismissed. It's 'he say/she say.'Lupe Fiasco calls the POTUS a *********...he gets an invite to a talk show to discuss his reasoning. Pac get called out for possible PED usage...they hand out supoena's for court proceedings. I wish people realized how petty this all is. Just take the test or don't even bother talking about fighting the guy anymore.
If the judge has any common sense, he'll ask why Pacquiao didn't want to go through random testing for $50 million.
Also, Pacquiao insinuated that Mayweather was taking steroids as well in the same article that was published quoting Sr.'s initial assumptions. Once again, though, Mayweather didn't take it to the courtroom.Comment
-
You don't argue an implication with another implication. That makes no sense whatsoever.Exactly, which is why the case will probably end up getting dismissed. It's 'he say/she say.'
If the judge has any common sense, he'll ask why Pacquiao didn't want to go through random testing for $50 million.
Also, Pacquiao insinuated that Mayweather was taking steroids as well in the same article that was published quoting Sr.'s initial assumptions. Once again, though, Mayweather didn't take it to the courtroom.
The question is if pacquiao initially refused the blood testing. If the answer is yes, the next logical question would be 'why'? A logical answer would be because the boxing commission does not ask for such a test, and pacquiao adheres to only the tests required by the commission.
Asking about the $50million potential for the fight and negating that would imply that pacquiao was hiding something. Its a leading question and not one a judge would rightfully ask.
We need to realize that the money generated for this fight is much greater to us common folks than it is to the boxers who generate millions anyway.
it's therefore easy to take a figure like $50 million and think that everybody has a price (Million Dollar Man and Virgil reference).
Comment
Comment