team pacquiao doesnt have to PROVE anything

[shadeyfizzle]

*****s keep saying that defamation case is gonna get thrown out because team pac cant PROVE that the mayweathers slandered pac.

Newsflash *****s. Its a civil suit. Nothing needs to be proven. The judge and/or jury only meed to be convinced whos side of the story is more likely, the plaintiff or defendants. And the way the mayweathers have all u morons convinced without a shadow of a doubt that pac is juicing team pacquiao has more than enough evidence to get a ruling.

[Las Vegas,]

I remember the days when Boxers sued promoters...not each other. /facepalm

[RespekonMyName]

I remember the days when Boxers sued promoters...not each other. /facepalm

Thread over.

[Rassclot]

I remember the days when Boxers sued promoters...not each other. /facepalm

do you remember the days when boxers would publicly declare their opponents are on steroids with 0 proof as an excuse to duck them?

[Discipline]

do you remember the days when boxers would outright say their opponents are on steroids with 0 proof in public as an excuse to duck them?

If you're the best, take the test.

[Rassclot]

If you're the best, take the test.

dunno why drooling ******s keep rambling on the same bull**** when Pac has already agreed to all tests.

[Las Vegas,]

dunno why drooling ******s keep rambling on the same bull**** when pac has already agreed to all tests.

The irony!!!!

[Rassclot]

The irony!!!!

hold on so you're not the ones rambling on ******ed sayings from the Mayweathers...


"If you're the best take the test" X100000


when Pac already agreed.



wipe that drool from your face reject.

[jtiger777]

well dont complain the fight isnt happening then

[p4p-champ]

civil lawsuit "peeleft: