Yeah he's implying that, but I can't see the UK money for Barker being much higher than the Russian(/German, if he has a profile there) money for Pirog.
If he said that Pirog wanted a bigger share of the pot than Barker then I think that's an understandable reason. Not that I would fully agree with a boxer choosing a lesser opponent for more money, but it makes some sense. But to me it just seems as if they are pulling out whatever random excuses come to mind, and the UK TV money just isn't a good one IMO.
If he said that Pirog wanted a bigger share of the pot than Barker then I think that's an understandable reason. Not that I would fully agree with a boxer choosing a lesser opponent for more money, but it makes some sense. But to me it just seems as if they are pulling out whatever random excuses come to mind, and the UK TV money just isn't a good one IMO.
Comment