Does a Haye win vs THIS Klitschko validate him as a ATG HW?

[£-4-£]

so the clincher in your eyes wouldn't be to win by KO vs BOTH the bros but beating bums (Adamek is the only one in your list not a bum) after that??? hmmmmmm........interesting......

You're misunderstanding.

If Haye clears the division out over a couple years, it shows longevity and true dominance. The depth of his resume would therefore be comparable to those of the Klits, however having beaten them he over-takes them and therefore there is more of a case for Haye to be considered an ATG.

[extracurRICular]

You're misunderstanding.

If Haye clears the division out over a couple years, it shows longevity and true dominance. The depth of his resume would therefore be comparable to those of the Klits, however having beaten them he over-takes them and therefore there is more of a case for Haye to be considered an ATG.

This would be true in any other era other than this HW era........beating a bunch of bums over and over doesn't do much to show dominance IMO....the only two kats worth a hill of beans are the klit bros.

[£-4-£]

You can only beat those who have been put infront of you.. This is a poor HW division, but if he completely clears it out and dominates it then he might just get recognised as a low-ranking ATG HW like I said. Definite Hall of Famer though.

[KnockUTheFukOut]

??? He hasn't done ****...one or two big wins don't make you a ***IN ATG

[Earl-Hickey]

No and i'm not sure what it would make the klitshkos either

[NChristo]

The term ATG seems to get thrown around way way too much on here.

[mdportorock3]

No, that's like saying that Bustar Douglas is al ATG because he took Tysons 0

[extracurRICular]

No, that's like saying that Bustar Douglas is al ATG because he took Tysons 0

Point was already made way early in the thread......but still a good one!