Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao Has No Fights That Can Guage

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Code Red View Post
    How well he would do against Mayweather. Shane Mosley, Marquez, none of these opponents prepares him for Mayweather. Its been years and I still believe Pac has no chance vs Floyd. I still have yet to see anything that convinces me Pac can deal with Floyds speed, movement, and ring smarts. Ortiz is right now being described as fodder for Floyd but a good fight for Pacquiao, why?? Because Floyd is better than Paquiao and YOU know it!
    pac vs vic is good for the fans who want to see real ring actions....pbf fights are boring...for pac having no chance vs pbf, i suggest you say that to the pbf camp....i will not be surprised if they ask you HOW COME?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
      pac vs vic is good for the fans who want to see real ring actions....pbf fights are boring...for pac having no chance vs pbf, i suggest you say that to the pbf camp....i will not be surprised if they ask you HOW COME?
      The only two voices that matter in Floyd's camp other than Floyd himself is Roger and Floyd Sr. and they both feel and have stated many times that Pac would get his azz handed to him by Floyd. Take the test and Floyd wipes his azz with Manny Pacquiao, I sure Manny will ne happy to accept the leftovers
      Last edited by Code Red; 06-10-2011, 12:18 AM.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
        pac vs vic is good for the fans who want to see real ring actions....pbf fights are boring...for pac having no chance vs pbf, i suggest you say that to the pbf camp....i will not be surprised if they ask you HOW COME?
        Real ring actions? lol PBF fights are boring because he knows how to hit and not get hit, and although they're boring to the standard action fan, to most boxing fans even if they don't prefer it they can appreciate that he's good at BOXING.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
          pac vs vic is good for the fans who want to see real ring actions....pbf fights are boring...for pac having no chance vs pbf, i suggest you say that to the pbf camp....i will not be surprised if they ask you HOW COME?
          If Floyd was boring he wouldn't be the PPV king and the most talked about, debated fighter in boxing.........and yes he is good at BOXING
          Last edited by Code Red; 06-10-2011, 12:30 AM.

          Comment


          • #55
            I wish pac would grow some balls and take test...............

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by gcgc View Post
              I wish pac would grow some balls and take test...............
              Grow balls?? do they have a PED for that?

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Code Red View Post
                The key word is "preparation" Floyd's opponents will have him well prepared for Manny Pacquiao, Floyd will be the favorite, agree/disagree?
                man *******s dont like questions like that

                Comment


                • #58
                  Manny is a bum who fights bums, real talk.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Code Red View Post
                    How well he would do against Mayweather. Shane Mosley, Marquez, none of these opponents prepares him for Mayweather. Its been years and I still believe Pac has no chance vs Floyd. I still have yet to see anything that convinces me Pac can deal with Floyds speed, movement, and ring smarts. Ortiz is right now being described as fodder for Floyd but a good fight for Pacquiao, why?? Because Floyd is better than Paquiao and YOU know it!
                    Good Stuff. I have been saying this for years!!! In fact, I believe that Pacquiao hasn't gotten better as a fighter. Simply because he hasn't fought anyone that has made him better. He's not a better Boxer, because he hasn't fought anyone that has tested his Boxing skills. He hasn't become a better counter-puncher becuase he hasn't fought anyone that has made him counter-punch. He hasn't fought anyone that has tested his defense or make him a better defensive fighter. Since moving up, "Team Pacquiao" has carefully selected fighters with a multitude of flaws and easy-2-hit fighters perfectly made for a high volume southpaw puncher with speed.

                    Pacquiao and Roach said something in the Pre-fight interview prior to the Mosley Fight that summed up Pacquiao's Rise to stardom and the fighters they have chosen "not to fight" (I didn't want to use the word AVOIDED) since teaming together. Are you guys ready....you sure, here is goes: Both Roach and Pacquiao said: "SHANE MOSLEY WOULD BE THE FASTEST FIGHTER THEY HAVE FACED SINCE WORKING TOGETHER." WOW...does anyone have any Idea how big of a statement that is? A 40 year old, WAY PAST his prime fighter, who no longer has the ability to "pull-the-trigger"....IS THE FASTEST THEY HAVE EVER FACED...WOW!! That's just sad!!!
                    Last edited by Darryl1914; 06-10-2011, 12:58 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Darryl1914 View Post
                      Good Stuff. I have been saying this for years!!! In fact, I believe that Pacquiao hasn't gotten better as a fighter. Simply because he hasn't fought anyone that has made him better. He's not a better Boxer, because he hasn't fought anyone that has tested his Boxing skills. He hasn't become a better counter-puncher becuase he hasn't fought anyone that has made him counter-punch. He hasn't fought anyone that has tested his defense or make him a better defensive fighter. Since moving up, "Team Pacquiao" has carefully selected fighters with a multitude of flaws and easy-2-hit fighters perfectly made for a high volume southpaw puncher with speed.

                      Pacquiao and Roach said something in the Pre-fight interview prior to the Mosley Fight that summed up Pacquiao's Rise to stardom and the fighters they have chosen "not to fight" (I didn't want to use the word AVOIDED) since teaming together. Are you guys ready....you sure, here is goes: Both Roach and Pacquiao said: "SHANE MOSLEY WOULD BE THE FASTEST FIGHTER THEY HAVE FACED SINCE WORKING TOGETHER." WOW...does anyone have any Idea how big of a statement that is? A 40 year old, WAY PAST his prime fighter, who no longer has the ability to "pull-the-trigger"....IS THE FASTEST THEY HAVE EVER FACED...WOW!! That's just sad!!!
                      bumped for truth

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP