How is Marquez "ineffective" because he loss to Floyd?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49477
    • 5,031
    • 270
    • 104,043

    #21
    Originally posted by jrosales13
    I guess people don't understand what the word "physically" means.
    In referance of any future misunderstanding, this word is the key word of my post.

    Comment

    • -Kev-
      this is boxing
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 39960
      • 5,045
      • 1,449
      • 234,543

      #22
      Originally posted by BoxingFollower
      Truth about it is, Floyd would have always beating Marquez, it's just there styles.

      But 147 just made him look super slow and sluggish.
      Yeah, he's gonna look super fast and very mobile this time around, 2 years later. He's gonna drink some of Hopkins piss.

      Comment

      • nj_evoixgsr
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 819
        • 33
        • 11
        • 7,073

        #23
        JMM is still P4P. JMM is still a much more experienced boxer and proven warrior. The loss versus Floyd only proved he was ineffective against another counter puncher who would not go offensive to counter himself. He was outclassed because he had to everything that played in favor floyd.

        Floyd vs Ortiz is the greatest thing ever because floyd fans say so. Ortiz doesn't have a 0, the next best thing, he is young and just beat an B fighter in Berto. Ortiz is not in the level of PAC or his previous opponents. Besides Shane, are you saying he's better than Marg or Cotto? **** out of here.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #24
          Originally posted by nj_evoixgsr
          JMM is still P4P.
          P4P is not a weight-class.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP