Will Froch now FINALLY be recognised as a top10 P4P fighter?

[vacon04]

No one can deny Froch hasnt had tough fights in the super 6, its almost like a competion where you cant avoid people by politics and locked in a room and have it out.

But his performance against Arthur Abrahams is the only performance so far that is p4p material performance wise. I suppose any p4p top 10 would have done that to AA as well though.

Im not knocking Froch as im british but just being realistic. Last minute win over JT, loss to Kessler and sub par performance against Johnson proves Froch isnt quite there yet. Pac has a sub par performance against SSM and wins 12 rounds.

But he is one of the toughest, you have to almost nail him to the floor to beat him.

Yeah but Mosley was done, we all knew that Pac-Mosley was going to be bad. Johnson even at 42 has a lot of talent and still can fight at a high level and even win among some of the best of the division. Sub par performance by Froch? I thought he did good, he had a gameplay and executioned it pretty well, for me he clearly won the fight.

So I really don't think that's a good comparison, right now Johnson is way better than SSM.

[Steak]

just because Glen is 42 doesnt mean hes as old and shot as Mosley. Glen has aged very well and was coming off a nice KO of Allan Green, which was a good win and Green had never been stopped before.

meanwhile Mosley was going to draw and looking like crap against Sergio Mora...who not too long after got beaten by a journeyman in Vera.

big difference.

[The_Golden_Goy]

just because Glen is 42 doesnt mean hes as old and shot as Mosley. Glen has aged very well and was coming off a nice KO of Allan Green, which was a good win and Green had never been stopped before.

meanwhile Mosley was going to draw and looking like crap against Sergio Mora...who not too long after got beaten by a journeyman in Vera.

big difference.

true this ^^^^^^^^

[loui_ludwig]

I like Froch but HELL NO.

[a-force]

Segura???? For beating Calderon? GTFOH