Will Froch now FINALLY be recognised as a top10 P4P fighter?

[The Hammer]

Ok, so where does he rank on your list?

I'd put him at #9.

[Heeb]

Ward's only great win was against Kessler. But there's no denying that Calzaghe took a bit of Kessler's soul and he's never been the same. However it was a great performance from Ward to beat Kessler.But Froch is the one that nearly retired Kessler.

It was a close loss and against a top opponent in Kessler. Bradley is an over-hyped American. If Froch was a Yank he'd be in the top-10 list.

Bro, at least be consistent.

[Steak]

It is pretty BS that someone like Froch can consistantly beat top competition over and over, while someone like Segura gets on the list just because he beat an overrated and old Calderon.

[coreyg100]

Froch is top 10. For the way Ward fights I still don't see him as top 10. Maybe top 15.

[Heeb]

I'd rate Froch on the lower end of the top 10 p4p.

[Steak]

What why should Segura be taken off?If anyone is taken off it should be Pongsalek hes done nothing since the Kameda win

I think Froch should rated over both right now, honestly.

[Shadows]

P4P lists are pointless, why so much debate over them?

Still, looking at the current P4P lists and the possible fighters on the list is a bit disheartening; there's not much genuine talent out there.

[daggum]

Bernard Hopkins was in the Ring p4p top 5 the week after his loss to Calzaghe.

was it because the ring is racist or was it because a lot of the people who do the ring rankings didn't think he lost and even if they did think he lost it was just barely to a top guy. i'm gonna go with.............racism!

[daggum]

It was a close loss and against a top opponent in Kessler. Bradley is an over-hyped American. If Froch was a Yank he'd be in the top-10 list.

you just said kessler's soul had been taken by calzaghe when he fought ward. why would the ring put a guy who lost to someone with no soul in the p4p list?

[hugh grant]

No one can deny Froch hasnt had tough fights in the super 6, its almost like a competion where you cant avoid people by politics and locked in a room and have it out.

But his performance against Arthur Abrahams is the only performance so far that is p4p material performance wise. I suppose any p4p top 10 would have done that to AA as well though.

Im not knocking Froch as im british but just being realistic. Last minute win over JT, loss to Kessler and sub par performance against Johnson proves Froch isnt quite there yet. Pac has a sub par performance against SSM and wins 12 rounds.

But he is one of the toughest, you have to almost nail him to the floor to beat him.