Bradley is a legit champ and deserves all the credit he gets.
What has Tim Bradley ever done?
Collapse
-
Every ranking is based on opinion so what's ya point??The ring is the most respected ranking there is so ill go by them..
It shows thatyou would go to great lenghts to discredit Bradley which is sad..You are better then that Dirk..Comment
-
Oh ok, lets go by Ring Rankings then. When Bradley beat Witter, he didnt become "no1" as you would say. Paulie Malignaggi did. Hatton was champ and Malignaggi was "no1" when they fought each other. Bum ass Bradley didnt beat either of them.
WhooopsComment
-
You asked when did Timmybeat the num 1 ranked jr WW and I said when he beat Witter..This post makes no sense and has nothing to do with what me and you were talking about once again you will do anything to discredit Bradley and it shows..Comment
-
I consider the no1 to be "The Man" of the division. Timmy never beat that guy.
To be the man, you gotta beat the man.
You said Timmy became no1 when he beat Witter. But according to Ring, he didnt. So your logic fails.Comment
-
You asked when did Timmybeat the num 1 ranked jr WW and I said when he beat Witter..This post makes no sense and has nothing to do with what me and you were talking about once again you will do anything to discredit Bradley and it shows..Comment
-
The thing about having to beat the no1 ranked guy is nonsense, you said yourself ‘every rank is based on opinion’.
If Khan beats Zab a top guy at 140 with a belt and Bradley doesn’t fight or fights someone of a noticeably lesser name Khan has a more than legitimate claim of being top guy at 140.Comment
-
Thats exactly what im saying. Good post.The thing about having to beat the no1 ranked guy is nonsense, you said yourself ‘every rank is based on opinion’.
If Khan beats Zab a top guy at 140 with a belt and Bradley doesn’t fight or fights someone of a noticeably lesser name Khan has a more than legitimate claim of being top guy at 140.Comment
-
Comment