What has Tim Bradley ever done?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Khan has fought a whole bunch of "B" level (maybe C) fighters too and alot of people run around here like if he too is a megastar so whats the point? I'm not trying to take sides here but if you going to take a shot at Bradley, you might as well critique the whole weight class and everyone in it.

Khan has put on better and more exciting performances. Sorry but the kid has star quality, anyone can see that. Tim Bradley.....errr not so much.

[boricuajr23]

Khan has put on better and more exciting performances. Sorry but the kid has star quality, anyone can see that. Tim Bradley.....errr not so much.

oh dont get me wrong, I agree with you with Khan but exciting performances has nothing to do with quality of opposition. Bradley has a decent quality of opposition fighting at 140. His fights might not be as entertaining as people may want them to be but he has won them all.

[Rome-By-Ko]

He has dominated very good comp and is the num1 guy in the div,there has never been a disputed victory this alone should answer ya question..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Khan has put on better and more exciting performances. Sorry but the kid has star quality, anyone can see that. Tim Bradley.....errr not so much.

Outside of Khan Maidana Khans fights have not been all that exciting..And if anybody says Bradley Holt and Bradley Peterson were not good fights I would have to say they should just watch MMA..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

oh dont get me wrong, I agree with you with Khan but exciting performances has nothing to do with quality of opposition. Bradley has a decent quality of opposition fighting at 140. His fights might not be as entertaining as people may want them to be but he has won them all.

His best opponent was Alexander who'd just come off the back of losing to Kotelnik. That tells you what his opposition has been like. Khan has been in the division less time and has got as good, if not better quality of opp.

His performances have been predominantly garbage despite winning.

[bojangles1987]

His best opponent was Alexander who'd just come off the back of losing to Kotelnik. That tells you what his opposition has been like. Khan has been in the division less time and has got as good, if not better quality of opp.

His performances have been predominantly garbage despite winning.

Alexander was NOT his best win, just his most hyped fight.

Witter, Holt, hell I think Peterson was a better win than Alexander was.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Alexander was NOT his best win, just his most hyped fight.

Witter, Holt, hell I think Peterson was a better win than Alexander was.

Yeah im still underwhelmed.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Alexander was NOT his best win, just his most hyped fight.

Witter, Holt, hell I think Peterson was a better win than Alexander was.

I totally agree with this..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Even Holt was a fraud champion. He Bradleyed (headbutted) the title off Torres and never gave him a 3rd fight.

Bradley is a two time fraud unified champion.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Khan beat Kotelnik for his title you moron, Holt isnt that great a win, Junior Witter was capable but limited, Campbell was headbutted into submission, Alexander fight was a bore fest so whats the big deal?

If Khan beats Judah he'll be no.1 in the division, no doubt about it

Can't be num 1 without beating num 1 everyone knows that..Nice try tho..