What has Tim Bradley ever done?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #81
    Originally posted by MCCCXXXIII
    You are really not making any sense whatsoever you say you can’t be no1 in the division without beating no1. Hatton was the No1 guy in the division not Witter. I’m not sure what you mean buy saying Hatton was the champ so he is not what you are talking about?

    You need to stop trying so hard you go round in circles and really it is you who is making yourself look quite the clown.


    Witter was ranked num1(which Bradley is now)and Bradley beat him,I don't know why we talking about Hatton for on the rankings he is listed as the Champ..Bradley is now in the same place Witter was when he beat him..So Bradley beat a num 1 ranked fighter,so he beat the num 1 ranked fighter..And Now he is the num 1 fighter..Is what I'm saying wrong if so help me understand why that is..

    Comment

    • The_Golden_Goy
      Interim Champion
      • Mar 2011
      • 963
      • 43
      • 63
      • 7,164

      #82
      Witter was pants man, didnt really rate the guy at all. Bradley got lucky avoiding Hatton and going after Witter for the WBC belt

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #83
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        According to Ring. But when Bradley beat him, he didnt become the num 1.

        But you said.....



        ...........
        And who is num 1 now do you believe his win over Witter had nothing to do with it??After Paulie M lost to Hatton who became num 1??And the Witter win was the main reason why..

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #84
          Originally posted by romebyko
          And who is num 1 now do you believe his win over Witter had nothing to do with it??After Paulie M lost to Hatton who became num 1??And the Witter win was the main reason why..
          You said you become the no1 when you beat the no1.....that turned out to be false. Stop backtracking.

          Khan doesnt have to beat Bradley. Bradley is not "the man". All Khan has to do is have as good as or better resume, better performances and be a more skilled fighter. And hes well on his way to doing that.

          *** Bradley.

          Comment

          • KnockUTheFukOut
            biased ****rider
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2010
            • 4184
            • 175
            • 39
            • 10,520

            #85
            The worse type of fans are fans who are SO BIASED TO "THEIR OWN" that they can't even give OTHER FIGHTERS CREDIT

            Always looking to DISCREDIT THE COMPETITION, sadly this is how todays boxing fans are. They have NO RESPECT!

            To Say Bradley Hasn't Done Anything And Then IN THE SAME THREAD Try To Turn Around And Hype Up Khan...THAT IS LAUGHABLE!

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #86
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              You said you become the no1 when you beat the no1.....that turned out to be false. Stop backtracking.

              Khan doesnt have to beat Bradley. Bradley is not "the man". All Khan has to do is have as good as or better resume, better performances and be a more skilled fighter. And hes well on his way to doing that.

              *** Bradley.
              I said to be num 1 you have to beat num 1,not you become num 1 when you beat num 1 get it right fool..Bradley beat a num 1 fighter and is now num 1 nobody is backtracking..You are making things up as you go along..

              Khan has to beat Bradley to become num 1 dude plain and simple..If Bradley was ranked at 4 or 3 at the time he beat Witteer he would have been the num 1 Jr WW but he was not,he was ranked like 10(if even ranked at all)Khan is num 2 and Bradley just beat(imo)the num 3 Jr WW in the World noway does Khan become num 1 by beating the num 6 ranked fight in the Div..Unless Bradley is massively inactive..

              Comment

              • The_Golden_Goy
                Interim Champion
                • Mar 2011
                • 963
                • 43
                • 63
                • 7,164

                #87
                Originally posted by romebyko
                I said to be num 1 you have to beat num 1,not you become num 1 when you beat num 1 get it right fool..Bradley beat a num 1 fighter and is now num 1 nobody is backtracking..You are making things up as you go along..

                Khan has to beat Bradley to become num 1 dude plain and simple..If Bradley was ranked at 4 or 3 at the time he beat Witteer he would have been the num 1 Jr WW but he was not,he was ranked like 10(if even ranked at all)Khan is num 2 and Bradley just beat(imo)the num 3 Jr WW in the World noway does Khan become num 1 by beating the num 6 ranked fight in the Div..Unless Bradley is massively inactive..
                If Khan has a better resume then yes he does become number one. Bradley ahsnt had a defining fight yet to make his untouchable at the top LWW, their resumes are close enough as it is. If Khan beats Judah, hes no.1 in the division its that simple mate

                Accept it

                Comment

                • wazaa.
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 13956
                  • 773
                  • 643
                  • 15,658

                  #88
                  Originally posted by romebyko
                  I said to be num 1 you have to beat num 1,not you become num 1 when you beat num 1 get it right fool..Bradley beat a num 1 fighter and is now num 1 nobody is backtracking..You are making things up as you go along..

                  Khan has to beat Bradley to become num 1 dude plain and simple..If Bradley was ranked at 4 or 3 at the time he beat Witteer he would have been the num 1 Jr WW but he was not,he was ranked like 10(if even ranked at all)Khan is num 2 and Bradley just beat(imo)the num 3 Jr WW in the World noway does Khan become num 1 by beating the num 6 ranked fight in the Div..Unless Bradley is massively inactive..

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #89
                    Originally posted by wazaa.
                    My thoughts exactly....

                    Comment

                    • sweetpea87
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 4329
                      • 723
                      • 1,606
                      • 58,530

                      #90
                      I think he has done well at 140, but he really shouldn't have ducked Khan like he did. He shouldn't be in the run for a Pacquiao or possible Mayweather fight if he won't even fight Khan. He should have taken that date in July to fight Khan, and if he won then he could talk about fighting Pac or Mayweather.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP