this imo is a close call i mean no shot in hell pacquiao does what b hop did at 46
but pacquiaos accomplished alot
id say they are both top 15 atg no doubt
this imo is a close call i mean no shot in hell pacquiao does what b hop did at 46
but pacquiaos accomplished alot
id say they are both top 15 atg no doubt
if they are top15 atg "no doubt" who do you have as 16-20?
And this means what? That if you're a star in a very specific part of the world your a global superstar? Anything besides US is considered "global"? lol.
And this means what? That if you're a star in a very specific part of the world your a global superstar? Anything besides US is considered "global"? lol.
not really but US has the biggest market for boxers if your popular in the U.S chances are you are more popular than euro boxer like sturm, abraham and the klits. One thing is for sure brits know pac because of the hatton win.
So has Pacquiaos fought smaller men. Erik Morales, Barrera, Juan Manuel Marquez.
.
Since when did Pac fight smaller men? Pac purposely stayed at a lighter weight and still beat the people. He was fighting people at their best weight when Pacs best weight was 140 Pac has now stepped up and beating bigger people at their best weight as well. Did BH ever go down in weight to accomodate Tito, DLH and others, no!
Originally posted by NORMAN BLACK
Resume bhop is slighlty ahead but PAC's fight are way more exciting BHOP fights are snooze fest.
Pacs resume is superior to BHs. BH hasnt got anyone as good as Barrera or Morales, or JMM. Tito and DLH are good, but they had to step up to BHs weight and they are smallish guys. Than Pac beats guys like Cotto and Margarito and these guys are better than the Pascals easiliy
Comment