Carl FROCH MYTHS EXPOSED Volume 1-"DIRRELL GOT ROBBED"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • J Dubb II 330
    Call Me Nighthawk
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 1916
    • 89
    • 93
    • 8,461

    #31
    it don't matter, the fight is over, it don't matter what you or anyone else thinks, it just so happens there are more people against your skewed and bias analysis, Dirrell has moved on. Unbias fans are replying to your thread on here, it has nothing to do with being American or not, it has to do with the apparent robbery, and the fact Froch couldn't believe it was a SD, Froch losing to Kessler, I call that Karma. I might be the only Dirrell fan on this site, those boxrec stats are false, I would watch on YouTube and do my own punch stats to "debunk " you but one you wouldn't take my word and two I have a life, unlike you who needs to complain about the general publics view on the Dirrell - Froch, Froch won the fight according to the judges, I guess in your mind they are infallible. so get over it and move on, find a shoulder to cry on when Johnson gives Froch a boxing lesson.

    Comment

    • -PANDA-
      ..Playa by Nature..
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 5785
      • 349
      • 854
      • 12,837

      #32
      Originally posted by slimshandy69
      actually the best shot landed the whole night was by froch, in round 8, as the first video shows.

      Dirrell best shot, and round was round 10, which deservidly lost a point(should have been disqualified for illegal ducking and holding) in. So in effect his best round was a draw.

      Dirrell actually admitted froch got round 12, and Gary shaw is on record as saying "it was no robbery", ill happily showyou the quote if you like my clog whielding friend.

      Please take my advice since you are seething and have lost, log off, and find yourself a partner...
      actually no it wasnt....show me the quotes with valid articles and panda might believe shaw and dirrell said that. but while ure at it watch fight camp 360 episode 2 and 3...it has about 5 minute footage of dirrell and his team outraged over the robbery and froch looking like a loser even taking the bus. so even if u are able to find those articles (doubtful) u will immediately be contradicted by showtime's finest cameramen u little bigot

      this isnt about winning or losing u grade school xenophobe...its about what actually happened. also lol at thinking panda doesnt get laid...not that its any of ur business but any frequent poster in the lounge knows my game

      pwned, decapitated, shot through the head....

      Comment

      • sdcluser
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2011
        • 4072
        • 51
        • 51
        • 10,319

        #33
        Originally posted by CantBeTouched
        Froch still got embarrassed by Kessler. And gets destroyed by Ward. give it up
        He didn't get embarrassed by Kessler. That fight was close and I agree with the decision. The problem with Froch is that he cannot fight inside. With guy with good foot movement, he could have a lot of problem on the outside as well.

        Comment

        • physiker
          Banned
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Apr 2011
          • 866
          • 26
          • 28
          • 958

          #34
          Shame on TS posting this again as I have several times put up the Poll showing most people here know Dirrell won. I like Froch now. But those stats came from boxrec, not Compubox, and boxrec has lost all crdibility because of that.

          Once again:



          Above is the poll from NSB here on Froch-Dirrell. Started the next day or so, when the facts were fresh.

          It has 220 to 73 or 69% to 23% in favor of Dirrell over Froch. Your colleagues here at NSB have spoken clearly.


          Stop being a Frochtard.

          Comment

          • slimshandy69
            I HAVE ***** TATTOO!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2009
            • 3642
            • 323
            • 3
            • 16,514

            #35
            Originally posted by J Dubb II 330
            it don't matter, the fight is over, it don't matter what you or anyone else thinks, it just so happens there are more people against your skewed and bias analysis, Dirrell has moved on. Unbias fans are replying to your thread on here, it has nothing to do with being American or not, it has to do with the apparent robbery, and the fact Froch couldn't believe it was a SD, Froch losing to Kessler, I call that Karma. I might be the only Dirrell fan on this site, those boxrec stats are false, I would watch on YouTube and do my own punch stats to "debunk " you but one you wouldn't take my word and two I have a life, unlike you who needs to complain about the general publics view on the Dirrell - Froch, Froch won the fight according to the judges, I guess in your mind they are infallible. so get over it and move on, find a shoulder to cry on when Johnson gives Froch a boxing lesson.
            its irrelevant what your project dwelling ass thinks, the fact is, i am aswering the dying breed of posters that thought the fight was a "robbery".

            I thought froch beat kessler, as did alot of people, but alot of people thought kessler won. Therefore its my opinion froch won, but it was no robbery as so many people thought kessler won.

            The youtube comments, the american pundits, the youtube videos, the punch stats, the press row, the ringside judges all back me up, and not you.

            All you have as back up is a windmill wanking clog jerking **** whos only chance of sex is the redlight district in amsterdam as evidence.

            So until any of these obese American ****s can show me otherwise, ive absolutely schooled everyone of my enemies on this thread.


            Nexttttttttttttttt

            Comment

            • J Dubb II 330
              Call Me Nighthawk
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 1916
              • 89
              • 93
              • 8,461

              #36
              Originally posted by slimshandy69
              its irrelevant what your project dwelling ass thinks, the fact is, i am aswering the dying breed of posters that thought the fight was a "robbery".

              I thought froch beat kessler, as did alot of people, but alot of people thought kessler won. Therefore its my opinion froch won, but it was no robbery as so many people thought kessler won.

              The youtube comments, the american pundits, the youtube videos, the punch stats, the press row, the ringside judges all back me up, and not you.

              All you have as back up is a windmill wanking clog jerking **** whos only chance of sex is the redlight district in amsterdam as evidence.

              So until any of these obese American ****s can show me otherwise, ive absolutely schooled everyone of my enemies on this thread.


              Nexttttttttttttttt
              lol whatever you say clown

              Comment

              • -PANDA-
                ..Playa by Nature..
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 5785
                • 349
                • 854
                • 12,837

                #37
                where them quotes at?

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #38
                  In two years I have not heard a single argument about Froch winning because of anything he actually did that was anywhere in the realm of legitimate, it is always about what Dirrell did. That there says it all.

                  The game is about being punched effective more so than the other guy, a style merely plays into that and is no way a determining factor for who should win. OK a guy might fight in a way you dislike but who landed the better blows~

                  Comment

                  • Medved
                    Oh Mah Gawd!
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Aug 2010
                    • 23633
                    • 757
                    • 323
                    • 30,849

                    #39
                    Direll is another "slick" coward who should be banned from Boxing. He is an emberassment to the sport and I hope nobody sanctions any of his future fights.

                    Comment

                    • Medved
                      Oh Mah Gawd!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 23633
                      • 757
                      • 323
                      • 30,849

                      #40
                      Originally posted by physiker
                      Shame on TS posting this again as I have several times put up the Poll showing most people here know Dirrell won. I like Froch now. But those stats came from boxrec, not Compubox, and boxrec has lost all crdibility because of that.

                      Once again:



                      Above is the poll from NSB here on Froch-Dirrell. Started the next day or so, when the facts were fresh.

                      It has 220 to 73 or 69% to 23% in favor of Dirrell over Froch. Your colleagues here at NSB have spoken clearly.


                      Stop being a Frochtard.
                      Well -Panda- has like 50 accounts, so thats not really a fair guide. Alot of the trolls here have a million accounts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP