it don't matter, the fight is over, it don't matter what you or anyone else thinks, it just so happens there are more people against your skewed and bias analysis, Dirrell has moved on. Unbias fans are replying to your thread on here, it has nothing to do with being American or not, it has to do with the apparent robbery, and the fact Froch couldn't believe it was a SD, Froch losing to Kessler, I call that Karma. I might be the only Dirrell fan on this site, those boxrec stats are false, I would watch on YouTube and do my own punch stats to "debunk " you but one you wouldn't take my word and two I have a life, unlike you who needs to complain about the general publics view on the Dirrell - Froch, Froch won the fight according to the judges, I guess in your mind they are infallible. so get over it and move on, find a shoulder to cry on when Johnson gives Froch a boxing lesson.
Carl FROCH MYTHS EXPOSED Volume 1-"DIRRELL GOT ROBBED"
Collapse
-
-
actually the best shot landed the whole night was by froch, in round 8, as the first video shows.
Dirrell best shot, and round was round 10, which deservidly lost a point(should have been disqualified for illegal ducking and holding) in. So in effect his best round was a draw.
Dirrell actually admitted froch got round 12, and Gary shaw is on record as saying "it was no robbery", ill happily showyou the quote if you like my clog whielding friend.
Please take my advice since you are seething and have lost, log off, and find yourself a partner...
this isnt about winning or losing u grade school xenophobe...its about what actually happened. also lol at thinking panda doesnt get laid...not that its any of ur business but any frequent poster in the lounge knows my game
pwned, decapitated, shot through the head....Comment
-
He didn't get embarrassed by Kessler. That fight was close and I agree with the decision. The problem with Froch is that he cannot fight inside. With guy with good foot movement, he could have a lot of problem on the outside as well.Comment
-
Shame on TS posting this again as I have several times put up the Poll showing most people here know Dirrell won. I like Froch now. But those stats came from boxrec, not Compubox, and boxrec has lost all crdibility because of that.
Once again:
Above is the poll from NSB here on Froch-Dirrell. Started the next day or so, when the facts were fresh.
It has 220 to 73 or 69% to 23% in favor of Dirrell over Froch. Your colleagues here at NSB have spoken clearly.
Stop being a Frochtard.Comment
-
it don't matter, the fight is over, it don't matter what you or anyone else thinks, it just so happens there are more people against your skewed and bias analysis, Dirrell has moved on. Unbias fans are replying to your thread on here, it has nothing to do with being American or not, it has to do with the apparent robbery, and the fact Froch couldn't believe it was a SD, Froch losing to Kessler, I call that Karma. I might be the only Dirrell fan on this site, those boxrec stats are false, I would watch on YouTube and do my own punch stats to "debunk " you but one you wouldn't take my word and two I have a life, unlike you who needs to complain about the general publics view on the Dirrell - Froch, Froch won the fight according to the judges, I guess in your mind they are infallible. so get over it and move on, find a shoulder to cry on when Johnson gives Froch a boxing lesson.
I thought froch beat kessler, as did alot of people, but alot of people thought kessler won. Therefore its my opinion froch won, but it was no robbery as so many people thought kessler won.
The youtube comments, the american pundits, the youtube videos, the punch stats, the press row, the ringside judges all back me up, and not you.
All you have as back up is a windmill wanking clog jerking **** whos only chance of sex is the redlight district in amsterdam as evidence.
So until any of these obese American ****s can show me otherwise, ive absolutely schooled everyone of my enemies on this thread.
NextttttttttttttttComment
-
its irrelevant what your project dwelling ass thinks, the fact is, i am aswering the dying breed of posters that thought the fight was a "robbery".
I thought froch beat kessler, as did alot of people, but alot of people thought kessler won. Therefore its my opinion froch won, but it was no robbery as so many people thought kessler won.
The youtube comments, the american pundits, the youtube videos, the punch stats, the press row, the ringside judges all back me up, and not you.
All you have as back up is a windmill wanking clog jerking **** whos only chance of sex is the redlight district in amsterdam as evidence.
So until any of these obese American ****s can show me otherwise, ive absolutely schooled everyone of my enemies on this thread.
NextttttttttttttttComment
-
In two years I have not heard a single argument about Froch winning because of anything he actually did that was anywhere in the realm of legitimate, it is always about what Dirrell did. That there says it all.
The game is about being punched effective more so than the other guy, a style merely plays into that and is no way a determining factor for who should win. OK a guy might fight in a way you dislike but who landed the better blows~Comment
-
Shame on TS posting this again as I have several times put up the Poll showing most people here know Dirrell won. I like Froch now. But those stats came from boxrec, not Compubox, and boxrec has lost all crdibility because of that.
Once again:
Above is the poll from NSB here on Froch-Dirrell. Started the next day or so, when the facts were fresh.
It has 220 to 73 or 69% to 23% in favor of Dirrell over Froch. Your colleagues here at NSB have spoken clearly.
Stop being a Frochtard.Comment
Comment