Carl FROCH MYTHS EXPOSED Volume 1-"DIRRELL GOT ROBBED"

[slimshandy69]

u say u were at froch-dirrell...how do we know ure not just making it up...but lets say u were, imagine being in a stadium with 8000 other people rooting for froch...how would u perceive the fight? logic...dont make me laugh

press row isnt evidence...or did everyone at press row score the fight the same? evidence is based on facts

boxingscene is representative for the general public...uve seen the polls

panda's dutch and if anything should be biased towards european boxers...fact of the matter is as a fan of the sport and a non-eurocentric individual dirrell won that fight to me, but to be fair froch has improved a lot since then as well

I was there, and regardless of what you say, i had a better view than you.

Boxing scene has more american posters, and also at the time froch was hated by calzaghe fans, and was generally hated by most british fans as well, only nottingham people really likd him.

but that aside, ive shown you an american, whom with which most of the youtube comments agree with, scoring it to froch. ive shown you pundits, punch stats and youtube videos and comments, again all agreeing with me.


All you shown is you live in a horribly ******* country where immigration, prostitution and locking people away for speaking the truth about evil islam, hardly something to be proud of.(gert wilders)

So seeth all you want my ugly friend, but until you actually bring some proof and evidence, i suggest you crawl back under that clog of yours, theres a good lad..

NEXTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

[IronDanHamza]

I felt Dirrell edged Froch in a very close fight that could have gone either way, that Dirrell could have won more convincingly had he been more active. Considering he was in Froch's hometown Vs the Champion, he should have known he would need to do more than he did.

I also felt Froch was behind on the score cards when he stopped Taylor, as did two of the judges.

[-PANDA-]

I was there, and regardless of what you say, i had a better view than you.

Boxing scene has more american posters, and also at the time froch was hated by calzaghe fans, and was generally hated by most british fans as well, only nottingham people really likd him.

but that aside, ive shown you an american, whom with which most of the youtube comments agree with, scoring it to froch. ive shown you pundits, punch stats and youtube videos and comments, again all agreeing with me.


All you shown is you live in a horribly ******* country where immigration, prostitution and locking people away for speaking the truth about evil islam, hardly something to be proud of.(gert wilders)

So seeth all you want my ugly friend, but until you actually bring some proof and evidence, i suggest you crawl back under that clog of yours, theres a good lad..

NEXTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

u havent proven **** uve just repeated urself and exposed ur inability to adapt in a fair discussion

that sounds more like britain to me and thinking prostitution is legal in the netherlands just shows how much of an idiot u are. geert wilders hasnt even been sentenced yet and is unlikely to suffer any jail time. keep em coming nick griffin

[-PANDA-]

I felt Dirrell edged Froch in a very close fight that could have gone either way, that Dirrell could have won more convincingly had he been more active. Considering he was in Froch's hometown Vs the Champion, he should have known he would need to do more than he did.

I also felt Froch was behind on the score cards when he stopped Taylor, as did two of the judges.

dirrell actually hurt froch a couple of times and won the championship rounds...froch was unable to move dirrell...all the moving dirrell did was at his own will

[slimshandy69]

u havent proven **** uve just repeated urself and exposed ur inability to adapt in a fair discussion

that sounds more like britain to me and thinking prostitution is legal in the netherlands just shows how much of an idiot u are. geert wilders hasnt even been sentenced yet and is unlikely to suffer any jail time. keep em coming nick griffin

Nope, you still dont have any evidence to debunk mine, hence why you lose, so until you actually construct evidence to show that dirrell was "robbed", i suggest you calm down, log off, and find someone of the opposite sex.

NEXTTTTTTTTTTTT

[starjammer]

Ahhh slimshandy's quarterly thread to keep his nightmares at bay. Happy to accommodate you.

[The Hammer]

I have to sa the standard of posting on this forum is terrible, usually by americans it has to be said. Some obese yank earlier claimed Froch was, and i quote "embarrassingly behind Jermaine taylor on the score cards". I along withsomeone else rebuttled that quite easily. But ill do that more extensively in my "carl froch urban myths volume 2".


Any the quote avove is probably an obese AA hating on froch for no reason. So lets me debunk his blatant lie.

Full video of why dirrell blew it, and pretty much all of the comments agree dirrell lost the fight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fztqCbOUiTY

But that aside lets see what the other evidence says.

1)PUNCH STATS.

They was no punch sats from showtime, but the unbiased boxrec were live and kindly did it for us. Heres wha they found.


Dirrell was deducted one point in the tenth round for excessive holding.
Blows: Froch 153/475 32%; Dirrell 105/315 33%.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1433578

So in conclusion froch landed more punches, by quite some margin, add the fact dirrell illegally held, and ducked all night, shows boxrec were correct.


2) PRESS ROW.
Aside from froch rightfully winning, often the press row are good back ups to whether a fight wasa robbery or not. Guess what, they scored it to froch. 2 had froch winning and one had it a draw.

3) The pundits. The UK Showtime pundits of darren barker scored it to froch, add to that buncey and graham houston scored it to froch. But they are UK and you Obese Americans would cry about that.

Tankfully jimmy iowa and dan rafael both scored it to froch, with allan green and manny stewart, also both giving froch the nod. HArdly a Robbery hey.



And with all that being said, the most prominant US YOUTUBE Boxing pundit even scored it to froch, again with most people agreeing with him...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxWNh7QjoKo&feature=fvsr

good night.

Excellent post!

[-PANDA-]

Nope, you still dont have any evidence to debunk mine, hence why you lose, so until you actually construct evidence to show that dirrell was "robbed", i suggest you calm down, log off, and find someone of the opposite sex.

NEXTTTTTTTTTTTT

watching the fight is empirical evidence by itself...as for the opposite sex...the ts is on her period or so it seems so does that count?

[slimshandy69]

dirrell actually hurt froch a couple of times and won the championship rounds...froch was unable to move dirrell...all the moving dirrell did was at his own will

actually the best shot landed the whole night was by froch, in round 8, as the first video shows.

Dirrell best shot, and round was round 10, which deservidly lost a point(should have been disqualified for illegal ducking and holding) in. So in effect his best round was a draw.

Dirrell actually admitted froch got round 12, and Gary shaw is on record as saying "it was no robbery", ill happily showyou the quote if you like my clog whielding friend.

Please take my advice since you are seething and have lost, log off, and find yourself a partner...

[vacon04]

As I said before in another post, I think Froch won by a very small margin because he was much more aggressive than Dirrell. Dirrell kept falling all the time and started to run much more than was expected from him. If only Dirrell showed a little bit more heart and used his skills against Froch, he could've won, but he didn't. I had Froch up by 1 point when I saw the fight.