Better Resume, Marquez or Cotto?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
resume = accomplishments
i give it to jmm but it's close. if wins matters and so are losses. cotto's 2 ko losses drags his resume down for me more than it affected jmm with his 3 losses which are close and debatable.Comment
-
WTF! JMM doesnt even have a good resume..what are u guys talking about? u guys are nuts..Cotto has way better resume than JMM..
JMM's best win was against a SHOT AND OLD Barrera.
JMM overrated..Diaz was promising but it doesnt mean he was going to be good..promising doesnt mean *****!!! Diaz is a bum..
Cotto's best win was against the best version of Mosley in recent years..Last edited by joelab75; 04-28-2011, 11:44 AM.Comment
-
Agree with both!!!!Comment
-
Comment
-
if JMM was so good he should have dominate a shot Barrera and chris john..but he didnt. it was both a close fights..not because he had 2 close fights against Pac doesnt mean he is up there with Pac..it was just a close fight..same with Castillo against Mayweather..
and please..the better fighter doesnt mean *****..its all about resume..lots of better fighters out there didnt make the hall of fame. or even dominate boxing..its all about winning the fight not the skills..Comment
-
Marquez obviously, even though Cotto has some attributes Marquez lacks. Cotto hasn't been the same since Margarito though...
My only issue is when people say it ain't close, like I'm having a hard time picking one over the other.Comment
Comment