Originally posted by romebyko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
why don't Berto fans admit Berto duck Mosley??
Collapse
-
-
I dont like berto but i dont think he duck Mosley, He signed to fight him before so i would give him the benefit of doubt, They just couldnt agree to terms in the second negotiation due to Mosley embarrassing effort or lack of it in his previous fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostI forgot all about that. Thought you were talking about the first time. Blame HBO, they paid Berto the same to fight a bum that they would have to fight Mosley.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostI dont like berto but i dont think he duck Mosley, He signed to fight him before so i would give him the benefit of doubt, They just couldnt agree to terms in the second negotiation due to Mosley embarrassing effort or lack of it in his previous fight.
Comment
-
I thought that gift rapped decision rob he go against Collazo was enough for peopleto actually know this....
Comment
-
i thought he signed the fight until the tragedy.... unless im missing something, the guy is not bad for boxing, maybe he should fight mike jones next... but its not many big names for him to fight right now outside of cotto, pac, floyd, or paul williams.... maybe clottey?
Comment
-
There is sooooooooo much to say about the conversations that have taken place in this thread. I honestly dont know where to start.........I got it!!!!!!!!! Lets start with the fact that I am a fan of both Shane Mosley and Andre Berto.
Rome. You know you are my Homie, my Ace, my Potna. But you are wrong on so many levels in regards to calling Berto a duck for the 2nd round of negotiations(especially in the business sense of the matter). You are wrong about Mosley vs. Mora. You are wrong about Mosely and JMM's drawing power(We all now that JMM has a hard time drawing huge crowds, as well as Shane himself).
There are very few facts that help Mosley(No longer the WBA WW Champ after 05/01/10)in his case for turning down Berto(The WBC WW Champ, regardless of the fact that he won a vacant title. Hell if you want to talk about vacant title grabbers Cotto should be on the lips of many, remember Paul Williams......Yeah that guy was a WW title holder I wonder who has THAT belt now, could it be Manny?????? Where did he get that belt???????? Oh Yeah..........Cotto).
Weither you all want to admit it or not. These Belts(WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF)play a very important role in negotiations for bouts. Please see break down below.
1st round of negotiations.......
Mosley+Ring Legend+WBA WW Title= 60% purse.
Berto+Young Undefeated Champion+WBC WW Title= 40% purse.
Fair Deal.
2nd round of negotiations.......
Mosley+Ring Legend-WBA WW Title=50% purse.
Berto+Young Undefeated Champion+WBC WW Title=50% purse.
Fair Deal.
See it's logical, not hard to follow at all.
Now I agree that Shane is a sure fire HOFer and a current ring Legend. But it seems alot of ya'll are living off of Shane's past glory years, and thus inciting that as a case for Shane to turn down a Championship fight. He got ya'll goin with Margo, but before the Margo fight talk around town was that he should hang um up, and he's fading(see Mayorga fight.......last second KO, but was having more of a dificult time than expected)
Look at it like this Joe Louis was NOT the A-side on the Marciano vs. Louis match up, regardless of the fact that Joe was a legend. Same rule applies in a sense with Shane(albeit Shane is not THAT far past it, but nonetheless he showed in the Mayweather fight that he is somewhat past it for the most part, unless you all are willing to admit that Floyd is THAT good. Which I doubt any of you are willing to do).
So in my eyes. Young Champion WBC Belt Holder vs. Ring Legend coming off of an embrassing drubbing on the down side of his career equals 50/50. Losing the belt has to cost something, and it cost Shane 10% at the negotiation table. That was something that Shane was NOT willing to accept, and it's his right to not accept it as he has earned the right to pick and choose his opponents. But considering the business dynamics involved. It was a fair deal. I am willing to field any questions in regards to this post.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jtiger777 View Posti thought he signed the fight until the tragedy.... unless im missing something, the guy is not bad for boxing, maybe he should fight mike jones next... but its not many big names for him to fight right now outside of cotto, pac, floyd, or paul williams.... maybe clottey?
Comment
-
Originally posted by romebyko View PostWhat does Mosley losing or being out classed by Mayweather(viewed as one of the best fighters in the sport)have to do with Berto asking for 50/50??When he has never fought on a PPV and is not a draw??Mayweather KO Hatton did you hear Paulie ask for 50/50??Paulie was not a draw and Hatton has the better name..Ya dig Berto should have took the risk beacause the reward would have been a future HOF on his resume an would have made him that more legit..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chief2ndzOnly! View PostThere is sooooooooo much to say about the conversations that have taken place in this thread. I honestly dont know where to start.........I got it!!!!!!!!! Lets start with the fact that I am a fan of both Shane Mosley and Andre Berto.
Rome. You know you are my Homie, my Ace, my Potna. But you are wrong on so many levels in regards to calling Berto a duck for the 2nd round of negotiations(especially in the business sense of the matter). You are wrong about Mosley vs. Mora. You are wrong about Mosely and JMM's drawing power(We all now that JMM has a hard time drawing huge crowds, as well as Shane himself).
There are very few facts that help Mosley(No longer the WBA WW Champ after 05/01/10)in his case for turning down Berto(The WBC WW Champ, regardless of the fact that he won a vacant title. Hell if you want to talk about vacant title grabbers Cotto should be on the lips of many, remember Paul Williams......Yeah that guy was a WW title holder I wonder who has THAT belt now, could it be Manny?????? Where did he get that belt???????? Oh Yeah..........Cotto).
Weither you all want to admit it or not. These Belts(WBC, WBA, WBO, IBF)play a very important role in negotiations for bouts. Please see break down below.
1st round of negotiations.......
Mosley+Ring Legend+WBA WW Title= 60% purse.
Berto+Young Undefeated Champion+WBC WW Title= 40% purse.
Fair Deal.
2nd round of negotiations.......
Mosley+Ring Legend-WBA WW Title=50% purse.
Berto+Young Undefeated Champion+WBC WW Title=50% purse.
Fair Deal.
See it's logical, not hard to follow at all.
Now I agree that Shane is a sure fire HOFer and a current ring Legend. But it seems alot of ya'll are living off of Shane's past glory years, and thus inciting that as a case for Shane to turn down a Championship fight. He got ya'll goin with Margo, but before the Margo fight talk around town was that he should hang um up, and he's fading(see Mayorga fight.......last second KO, but was having more of a dificult time than expected)
Look at it like this Joe Louis was NOT the A-side on the Marciano vs. Louis match up, regardless of the fact that Joe was a legend. Same rule applies in a sense with Shane(albeit Shane is not THAT far past it, but nonetheless he showed in the Mayweather fight that he is somewhat past it for the most part, unless you all are willing to admit that Floyd is THAT good. Which I doubt any of you are willing to do).
So in my eyes. Young Champion WBC Belt Holder vs. Ring Legend coming off of an embrassing drubbing on the down side of his career equals 50/50. Losing the belt has to cost something, and it cost Shane 10% at the negotiation table. That was something that Shane was NOT willing to accept, and it's his right to not accept it as he has earned the right to pick and choose his opponents. But considering the business dynamics involved. It was a fair deal. I am willing to field any questions in regards to this post.
Belts mean **** dude Mayweather thought us that,its really about winning belts here and there but really who's name is on that resume..Right now Bertos resume would look ten times better if he had Shanes name with a W sitting next to it..I diig what ya saying but I totally disagree,I also believe guys like Berto is what's killing the sport..Do you believe Bradley or Khan would over price themselves to get a shot at a Cotto or a Pac or May??You neeed these nameson ya resume..Berto does not believe in himself which is why he ask for that money..If he would have lost to Mosley who many were saying was shot Bertos career would be over..
Comment
Comment