better resume..hopkins,pacman

[Larry the boss]

That would leave him behind him because he has a worse resume?

Seriously, why do you say **** like this?

What does beating someone in a H2H fight have to do with which fighter is greater?

Nothing.

guess torrecampo>>>manny according to him

[RubenSonny]

but can you defend it 20 times??

Are you asking me if I can personally defend the IBF middleweight title 20 times? Seriously is this what your response has boiled down to?

[hugh grant]

Name them.....

For starters he beat DLH better than BH did. Sure you will say DLH who fought BH was better than the version than Pac fought its your job to. He beat Cotto who was established himself as the biggest name in the sport for years and Pac dominated to the point where Cotto had to run to survive. He used Clottey as a punch bag and Margarito and the 2nd round ko of another many year established name Hatton in the 2nd round. Established name for many year types and not the pavliks that BH beat. Pavlik was only a name on the basis of a couple of good wins over JT. But he was inexperienced newbie in reality.
THe BH JC beat was a good version of BH as he has matured with age like a fine wine, and also i doubt any of BHs victims would have beat JC as well.

and torrecampo beat manny so where does that leave him

Well i dont think it would leave torrcampo as highly as JC because JC beat a highly regarded BH who was beathing many names and was competive. Why are Pac haters so predictable with bringing up torrecampo up? Was the Pac, torrecampo beat p4p no1 in the world at the time?

[Larry the boss]

Are you asking me if I can personally defend the IBF middleweight title 20 times? Seriously is this what your response has boiled down to?

not you personaly..you said anyone can win a title true..but can anyone defend it 20 times??thats the question

[bojangles1987]

For starters he beat DLH better than BH did. Sure you will say DLH who fought BH was better than the version than Pac fought its your job to. He beat Cotto who was established himself as the biggest name in the sport for years and Pac dominated to the point where Cotto had to run to survive. He used Clottey as a punch bag and Margarito and the 2nd round ko of another many year established name Hatton in the 2nd round. Established name for many year types and not the pavliks that BH beat. Pavlik was only a name on the basis of a couple of good wins over JT. But he was inexperienced newbie in reality.



Well i dont think it would leave torrcampo as highly as JC because JC beat a highly regarded BH who was beathing many names and was competive. Why are Pac haters so predictable with bringing up torrecampo up? Was the Pac, torrecampo beat p4p no1 in the world at the time?

Ugh. Way to make those of us picking Pacquiao look like morons.

[Larry the boss]

For starters he beat DLH better than BH did. Sure you will say DLH who fought BH was better than the version than Pac fought its your job to. He beat Cotto who was established himself as the biggest name in the sport for years and Pac dominated to the point where Cotto had to run to survive. He used Clottey as a punch bag and Margarito and the 2nd round ko of another many year established name Hatton in the 2nd round. Established name for many year types and not the pavliks that BH beat. Pavlik was only a name on the basis of a couple of good wins over JT. But he was inexperienced newbie in reality.
THe BH JC beat was a good version of BH as he has matured with age like a fine wine, and also i doubt any of BHs victims would have beat JC as well.



Well i dont think it would leave torrcampo as highly as JC because JC beat a highly regarded BH who was beathing many names and was competive. Why are Pac haters so predictable with bringing up torrecampo up? Was the Pac, torrecampo beat p4p no1 in the world at the time?

so you dont think bhop fought the better oscar??seriously???bhop was the first man to stop oscar and bascially made him a part time fighter

[Ko King 212]

For starters he beat DLH better than BH did. Sure you will say DLH who fought BH was better than the version than Pac fought its your job to. He beat Cotto who was established himself as the biggest name in the sport for years and Pac dominated to the point where Cotto had to run to survive. He used Clottey as a punch bag and Margarito and the 2nd round ko of another many year established name Hatton in the 2nd round. Established name for many year types and not the pavliks that BH beat. Pavlik was only a name on the basis of a couple of good wins over JT. But he was inexperienced newbie in reality.



Well i dont think it would leave torrcampo as highly as JC because JC beat a highly regarded BH who was beathing many names and was competive. Why are Pac haters so predictable with bringing up torrecampo up? Was the Pac, torrecampo beat p4p no1 in the world at the time?

Wait, You started it off with Oscar and proceeded with Cotto.

Oh I'm not debating with you fam. It's plain as day you just started watching PAC. It's no need to either go any further.

[RubenSonny]

not you personaly..you said anyone can win a title true..but can anyone defend it 20 times??thats the question

It doesnt mean anything to me, the relevant contenders he beat is whats important and what I give him credit for.

[Larry the boss]

For starters he beat DLH better than BH did. Sure you will say DLH who fought BH was better than the version than Pac fought its your job to. He beat Cotto who was established himself as the biggest name in the sport for years and Pac dominated to the point where Cotto had to run to survive. He used Clottey as a punch bag and Margarito and the 2nd round ko of another many year established name Hatton in the 2nd round. Established name for many year types and not the pavliks that BH beat. Pavlik was only a name on the basis of a couple of good wins over JT. But he was inexperienced newbie in reality.
THe BH JC beat was a good version of BH as he has matured with age like a fine wine, and also i doubt any of BHs victims would have beat JC as well.



Well i dont think it would leave torrcampo as highly as JC because JC beat a highly regarded BH who was beathing many names and was competive. Why are Pac haters so predictable with bringing up torrecampo up? Was the Pac, torrecampo beat p4p no1 in the world at the time?

im not a manny hater at all but you sound really dumb and new to the sport...jc beat a 43 year old hopkins but you act like mannys losses dont count if jc>hopkins..than torrecampo,singsurat>>manny

[jtiger777]

Wait, You started it off with Oscar and proceeded with Cotto.

Oh I'm not debating with you fame. It's plain as day you just started watching PAC. It's no need to either go any further.

lol great post!!!!!!!!!