most historic weight class in boxing history

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #21
    Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
    the smaller guys have been bringin' in the bigger checks though these days.
    i like all weight classes..but the bigger the guy the bigger the title imo....

    Comment

    • King Ju-Ju
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 6479
      • 147
      • 38
      • 6,758

      #22
      Originally posted by LarryX2011
      i like all weight classes..but the bigger the guy the bigger the title imo....
      so do i. i just like some more then others. i respect opinion though.

      Comment

      • King Ju-Ju
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 6479
        • 147
        • 38
        • 6,758

        #23
        Originally posted by LarryX2011
        most ww have tried to move up to gain the mw crown
        my man trinidad failed at that. well not really, he ko joppy and became the wba champion but failed vs hopkins for sole control of the weight class.

        Comment

        • CubanGuyNYC
          Latin From Manhattan
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 15414
          • 1,678
          • 1,706
          • 112,127

          #24
          Originally posted by Natedatpkid
          I'd say welterweight because it's been the most consistent. I honestly think it should be #1. Theres always been great fights at welterweight. I'd put lightweight over middleweight too. When middleweight is great, it's ****in amazing, but most the time it's terrible.

          Not much of a fan of the heavyweights but then again I didn't grow up in the 80's or 90's. I was a child in the 90's so I grew up with these weak ass fools we call chumps. I mean champs.
          The TS specified "historical". If we go by most of the heavyweights of the past thirty years, or so, then you're right. But the title "Heavyweight... Champion...of...the...World" has historically carried the greatest honor. No other division carries the same cachet. It's always meant, especially to the man on the street, "the Baddest Man on the Planet." John L. Sullivan, Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Mike Tyson, all these men have evoked images of invincibility in their time.

          Comment

          • $Bullsfam$
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 10252
            • 813
            • 630
            • 46,956

            #25
            Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
            i was the only one who thought of welterweight as #1 until u. i knew i would be in the minority. heavyweight has always been the cream of the crop. not so much these days. im 7 yrs older then u and got into boxing at like 5 so i remember tyson and holyfield, old foreman, bowe. i remember being like 7 or w.e. and watching tyson get ko by douglas. i was like 'papi what happened??? tyson lost. he isnt suppose to lose'. i thought he was unbeatable when i was a little kid.
            Hahaha thats awesome. I've always wanted to witness boxing history. Sadly the only can I can say I witnessed it "the most bought PPV in boxing history Floyd-Oscar". Kinda lame.

            I remember though when I was little always wanting to watch the fights but my ma's a jesus freak so she hates the ***** so I always tried to sneak in while one of her friends husbands or boyfriends were watching it. But I always got caught so never caught *****...

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 739
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #26
              Bantamweight, Lightweight, Welterweight>>>>>Heavyweight.

              Comment

              • $Bullsfam$
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 10252
                • 813
                • 630
                • 46,956

                #27
                Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC
                The TS specified "historical". If we go by most of the heavyweights of the past thirty years, or so, then you're right. But the title "Heavyweight... Champion...of...the...World" has historically carried the greatest honor. No other division carries the same cachet. It's always meant, especially to the man on the street, "the Baddest Man on the Planet." John L. Sullivan, Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Mike Tyson, all these men have evoked images of invincibility in their time.
                Yeah most definitely and I enjoy watching them at their best just sucks I couldn't watch them live. Takes a little of the fun out of it.

                Comment

                • Larry the boss
                  EDUCATED
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 90798
                  • 6,419
                  • 4,473
                  • 2,500,480

                  #28
                  Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
                  my man trinidad failed at that. well not really, he ko joppy and became the wba champion but failed vs hopkins for sole control of the weight class.
                  see thats my point..if you start at ww more than likely you gonna shoot for the mw crown

                  Comment

                  • Larry the boss
                    EDUCATED
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 90798
                    • 6,419
                    • 4,473
                    • 2,500,480

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Natedatpkid
                    I'd say welterweight because it's been the most consistent. I honestly think it should be #1. Theres always been great fights at welterweight. I'd put lightweight over middleweight too. When middleweight is great, it's ****in amazing, but most the time it's terrible.

                    Not much of a fan of the heavyweights but then again I didn't grow up in the 80's or 90's. I was a child in the 90's so I grew up with these weak ass fools we call chumps. I mean champs
                    .
                    he said historically...you're 18

                    Comment

                    • King Ju-Ju
                      Banned
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 6479
                      • 147
                      • 38
                      • 6,758

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Natedatpkid
                      Hahaha thats awesome. I've always wanted to witness boxing history. Sadly the only can I can say I witnessed it "the most bought PPV in boxing history Floyd-Oscar". Kinda lame.

                      I remember though when I was little always wanting to watch the fights but my ma's a jesus freak so she hates the ***** so I always tried to sneak in while one of her friends husbands or boyfriends were watching it. But I always got caught so never caught *****...
                      damn that sucks bro. both my parents love boxing. we had the illegal box and would see all the fights. those was the good old days. **** pay per view, it was free for view at my crib.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP