most historic weight class in boxing history

[CubanGuyNYC]

My opinion:

1. Heavyweight
2. Welterweight
3. Middleweight

There's never been much interest in the "junior" or "super" weights. It's like people consider them "made up" weights. Also, only boxing fans seem to care about the light heavyweight division.

[winky's right]

oh my bad lol. i agree with welter in 2nd and middle in 3rd

[Larry the boss]

heavyweight

middleweight

welterweight

lightweight


in that order..the bigger the buy the bigger the title

[STRUGG]

heavy.......welterweight......middleweight

[King Ju-Ju]

My opinion:

1. Heavyweight
2. Welterweight
3. Middleweight

There's never been much interest in the "junior" or "super" weights. It's like people consider them "made up" weights. Also, only boxing fans seem to care about the light heavyweight division.

yea they do look at them like that. a friend of mines said that before. and the light heavyweight division doesnt get much buz outside the boxng fan circle.

[King Ju-Ju]

almost everyone agrees to heavyweight being #1 but there seems to be a debate about middleweight and welterweight and which is #2.

[Larry the boss]

most ww have tried to move up to gain the mw crown

[$Bullsfam$]

I'd say welterweight because it's been the most consistent. I honestly think it should be #1. Theres always been great fights at welterweight. I'd put lightweight over middleweight too. When middleweight is great, it's ****in amazing, but most the time it's terrible.

Not much of a fan of the heavyweights but then again I didn't grow up in the 80's or 90's. I was a child in the 90's so I grew up with these weak ass fools we call chumps. I mean champs.

[King Ju-Ju]

heavyweight

middleweight

welterweight

lightweight


in that order..the bigger the buy the bigger the title

the smaller guys have been bringin' in the bigger checks though these days.

[King Ju-Ju]

I'd say welterweight because it's been the most consistent. I honestly think it should be #1. Theres always been great fights at welterweight. I'd put lightweight over middleweight too. When middleweight is great, it's ****in amazing, but most the time it's terrible.

Not much of a fan of the heavyweights but then again I didn't grow up in the 80's or 90's. I was a child in the 90's so I grew up with these weak ass fools we call chumps. I mean champs.

i was the only one who thought of welterweight as #1 until u. i knew i would be in the minority. heavyweight has always been the cream of the crop. not so much these days. im 7 yrs older then u and got into boxing at like 5 so i remember tyson and holyfield, old foreman, bowe. i remember being like 7 or w.e. and watching tyson get ko by douglas. i was like 'papi what happened??? tyson lost. he isnt suppose to lose'. i thought he was unbeatable when i was a little kid.