Pac Catchweights..title wins
Collapse
-
ok lets just leave the JMM fight out and answer me this question. did Manny Pacquiao beat the best fighters in those divisions since leaving 130? and did Manny even attempt to fight any of the top guys?
other then 147 obviouslyComment
-
That is just silly, how can you say one boxer will beat another boxer in the division IF they would of faced each other but didn't soo the boxer that actually faced the 'champ' and beat him should be discredited because another boxer in the division would of beaten the champ based on presuming ? .. based on that logic you could say Arthur Abraham would of beaten Kelly pavlik anyway so the fight that martinez won between pavlik isn't really crediblethe popular opinion is JMM was roped and Manny never gave him his rematch and spin it how you wanted Diaz was a paper champ the weakest in the division so again Manny went for the easy belt.
Hatton would have lost to Holt or Bradley and you know it no credible organization should have ranked Hatton number one that's for sure the ring lost lots of credibility for that stunt. they are no better then the WBC for giving Manny that vacant beltComment
-
Actually everybody focuses on Manny because he wins at catchweights. I'll call two examples of people who fought for titles at a catchweight and didn't win. Sergio Martinez vs Paul Williams catchweight at 158 for Martinez' middleweight 160 belt. I believe it was Williams demand since he won their last fight at a catchweight of 157. Well, we all know what happened Martinez 2 round ko. Matthew Hatton vs Saul Alvarez for vacant WBC junior middleweight belt of 154 at a catchweight of 150. Saul Alvarez wins by unanamious decision. Those are the recent examples.Comment
-
Yea.. manny should have stayed and fought at 130 instead of moving up and taking on ODLH/Hatton/Cotto.. You should start managing boxers.. you have a gift.Comment
-
based on how hatton looked against Lazcano he was clearly done and primed for pickingThat is just silly, how can you say one boxer will beat another boxer in the division IF they would of faced each other but didn't soo the boxer that actually faced the 'champ' and beat him should be discredited because another boxer in the division would of beaten the champ based on presuming ? .. based on that logic you could say Arthur Abraham would of beaten Kelly pavlik anyway so the fight that martinez won between pavlik isn't really credible
he was like an almost dead boxer and the vulchers were circlingComment
-
My goodness, you really like embarrassing yourself don't you?
Hatton was the lineal champ at 140 whether you like it or not.
Cotto beat Mosley, Mosley beat Margarito, Margarito beat Mosley.
By May 8th, Pac will have recorded dominant one-sided wins against ALL of them- the top welters of their generation.
But carry on...Comment
-
My goodness, you really like embarrassing yourself don't you?
Hatton was the lineal champ at 140 whether you like it or not.
Cotto beat Mosley, Mosley beat Margarito, Margarito beat Mosley.
By May 8th, Pac will have recorded dominant one-sided wins against ALL of them- the top welters of their generation.
But carry on...
He criticizes Pacquiao for not cleaning out the fighters at 130 ..
Then he proceeds to criticize Pacquiao for cleaning out the WW division..
Comment
-
Comment
-
your wasting your time arguing with them. they will never question pacs ****ty decisions because they are blinded by racial and national pride. dont waste your energy on them. what did you think about the gamboa fight?Comment

Comment