Pac Catchweights..title wins

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxingking500
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 2994
    • 131
    • 1
    • 3,320

    #11
    Originally posted by Mr. Blobby
    Yes


    Hatton was the lineal champion better than any of the 4 belts.
    then why do people make such a big deal all the time, dissing his catchweights, which have been part of boxing for a long time, but why do they call him the cathcweight king, he's only had 2.. i mean.. i dont get it

    Comment

    • Canelo Phresh
      LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2010
      • 13714
      • 829
      • 1,353
      • 23,724

      #12
      you can disect the cotto and marg victories as they were catchweights and neither of them were at their best but the hatton victory was a solid victory

      Comment

      • Phenom
        Phenomdeaux
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 12218
        • 494
        • 363
        • 101,474

        #13
        his last 5 titles is questionable and should really have an asterisk next to it

        Comment

        • boxingking500
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 2994
          • 131
          • 1
          • 3,320

          #14
          Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
          you can disect the cotto and marg victories as they were catchweights and neither of them were at their best but the hatton victory was a solid victory
          i dot get why people disect catchweights, since they have always been a part of boxing for a long time....

          Comment

          • boxingking500
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 2994
            • 131
            • 1
            • 3,320

            #15
            Originally posted by Phenom
            his last 5 title is questionable and should really have an asterisk next to it
            why??.....

            Comment

            • Rick Grimes
              The Walking Dead
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 5517
              • 253
              • 18
              • 517

              #16
              Originally posted by boxingking500
              i dot get why people disect catchweights, since they have always been a part of boxing for a long time....
              Because they are BS, we have already got weight limits. If you want to win a title beat the holder at his best at the proper weight limit, not at some BS catchweight limit that will take something out of him before the fight.

              Comment

              • Canelo Phresh
                LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2010
                • 13714
                • 829
                • 1,353
                • 23,724

                #17
                Originally posted by boxingking500
                i dot get why people disect catchweights, since they have always been a part of boxing for a long time....
                if its for a title and one that you want respect for fight at the titles weight.

                Comment

                • Canelo Phresh
                  LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 13714
                  • 829
                  • 1,353
                  • 23,724

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mr. Blobby
                  Because they are BS, we have already got weight limits. If you want to win a title beat the holder at his best at the proper weight limit, not at some BS catchweight limit that will take something out of him before the fight.
                  this right here

                  Comment

                  • boxingking500
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 2994
                    • 131
                    • 1
                    • 3,320

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Phenom
                    his last 5 titles is questionable and should really have an asterisk next to it
                    the only one you can question are cotto and margarito, being catchweights

                    marquez- could of gone either way.. split decision....

                    diaz- destroyed him

                    hatton- destroyed him..

                    how are all 5 questionable... only 2 are..

                    Comment

                    • boxingking500
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 2994
                      • 131
                      • 1
                      • 3,320

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
                      if its for a title and one that you want respect for fight at the titles weight.
                      it takes 2 people to sign... so therefore i count it as a legitimate win..

                      the other fighter does not have to sign for a catchweight match, but if he does, then it is legitimate in my view

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP