Comments Thread For: Sergio Martinez Rips Pacquiao: "He Fights No-Hopers"

[jrosales13]

so did i,his best weight wasn't goin to make ricky's defense any better

You also expected Pac to dominate Oscar right? right?

[ThePunchingBag]

so did i,his best weight wasn't goin to make ricky's defense any better

Should rephrase and say MOST people didn't expect it to happen.

Most people thought Hatton's chin would hold against a "smaller" guy.

[GRUSTLER]

Joshua says a lot of stuff after he losses, has an excuse after every lost, that is what Clottey does. So I don't understand your point.

Not saying that Clottey is a better win but just as good as a win.

Why are you ignoring the fact that Dzinziruk had only 1 fight in over 2 years. And, it was against Daniel Dawson? Should points be taken away from that?

Why are you ignoring the fact that the last time. Dzinziruk beat a top 10 guy was a bordeline top 10 guy was 35 months prior in facing Martinez/

You're looking at all the negative for Clottey but ignoring the negatives going for Dzinziurk.

Why is that?

Who's ******ed again? Where did I ever mention Clottey was the better win? The ******ed is you who doesn't have reading comprehension...

Do you want to go back and read what I said?

If you take everything into account from both sides. It was just as good of a win. Neither one was better. And, if one was better, it wasn't "much better"...

Clottey was a solid opponent for Pac at 147 but honestly man, all things aside, he hadn't achieved anything at that weight except "Almost beating Margarito", beating Zab Judah and "Almost beating Cotto". It's not me saying Sergei was a better win but rather the sport of boxing. Clottey stunk up the place. How is Clottey all of a sudden regarded as a better win, when in all actuality, if you match them, Sergei is a better win. Now back to your disrespect. You come out of the gate talking **** like you are this great poster because you like to take pieces of a paragraph and answer each line like you are some kind of analyst. You are a funny dude. I know you like to try to discredit me because it makes you think like you are smarter or a better poster than me but at the end of the day you want to be and all I am doing is posting about boxing and you talking about someone being retared? ******ed is a person trying to make himself believe that I'm ******ed because you want to be smart but that is something you can't achieve. Only thing you are doing, is showing people how much you are sweating me. Lets just keep it about the sport because if you want to go there with the disrespect and name calling I can get brutal..... trust.

[empiricix]

WOW..... Sergio went in on Pac. He is really obsessed with becoming the
P4P number 1 fighter in the sport.. I really like this line the most



It's funny how he thinks that Floyd and Cotto would fight him before Pac who is the best right now. Didn't expect that from Martinez. Dude blew Pac up.

You Sergio bandwagoners are hopeless! How can he claim to be fighting the best when he is calling out Cotto, who Pac had already beaten and who, according to you *****s, was already shot coming into the Pac fight?

I swear, the utter hypocrisy in these boards...

[led]

imagine the punch that K.O'd pwill landing on lil pac........I think he would go into acoma lol.

[LeadUppercut]

Of course you wanna see it. It's the last hope you have of ever seeing Pac beaten by anyone since your boy has lost the urge. Why not ask your boy to step up since he's bigger than Pac?

Look at all the *****s jumping on the Sergio bandwagon hoping for a proxy fight with Pac!

Yep, absolutely, I wanna see that fight

You *******s think it's fair that JMM jump two divisions to welter, then that cherry-picker Manny can fight sexy, Manny took something of his, now they can settle it in the ring

Why don't you want that fight ?

Huh ?

Tell me why you don't think that Manny should have to fight Martinez ?

I warn you, keep Marquez in mind when you answer that question

[LeadUppercut]

Pavlik was undefeated at 160, even after B-hop went back down to 160 and beat a top 10 MW fighter.

So how can you compare that to Margarito? It doesn't make sense...

It's comparable to Hatton who got KO'd at a weight-class higher but was still undefeated at JWW and was coming off a win against a top 10 JWW...Now that is similar...

There is no Margarito comparison, there is a Hatton comparison though.

That is a much more accurate comparison.

[MiguelDirrell25]

Pacs best win in the last 5yrs was a weight drained cotto ... fact is sergio killed pwill who most ****as on here was sayin is p4p top 5den whooped pavlik who was considered a live opponent.. den a solid fighter in dzinzuirk ..and a win against kermit despite the draw every1 knows sergio won ..

[GRUSTLER]

Joshua says a lot of stuff after he losses, has an excuse after every lost, that is what Clottey does. So I don't understand your point.

Just like you are doing now for Joshua Clottey. Making excuses. What excuses did Clottey make? In all them fights against Margarito, Cotto and Paquiao he dropped the ball. Those are not excuses but rather fact.

[jrosales13]

Clottey was a solid opponent for Pac at 147 but honestly man, all things aside, he hadn't achieved anything at that weight except "Almost beating Margarito", beating Zab Judah and "Almost beating Cotto". It's not me saying Sergei was a better win but rather the sport of boxing. Clottey stunk up the place. How is Clottey all of a sudden regarded as a better win, when in all actuality, if you match them, Sergei is a better win. Now back to your disrespect. You come out of the gate talking **** like you are this great poster because you like to take pieces of a paragraph and answer each line like you are some kind of analyst. You are a funny dude. I know you like to try to discredit me because it makes you think like you are smarter or a better poster than me but at the end of the day you want to be and all I am doing is posting about boxing and you talking about someone being retared? ******ed is a person trying to make himself believe that I'm ******ed because you want to be smart but that is something you can't achieve. Only thing you are doing, is showing people how much you are sweating me. Lets just keep it about the sport because if you want to go there with the disrespect and name calling I can get brutal..... trust.

I stopped reading right there.

What had Dzinziruk achieved at 160?

Think about it?

Doesn't take away from a solid win though, now does it?

Again, what you're doing is looking at all the negatives from one side and ignoring the negatives from the other side. Thus claiming one win is better than the other.

But, if you consider everything a put everything together. Then both wins are just as good as the other. And, if one is better, is NOT "much better".

I'm sorry I didn't waste my time reading the rest because, your first point killed whatever point you was trying to make.