true or false....sergio and floyd

[badass316]

Corales was P4P #5 in the year 2000.

Yes, my bad. I just looked it up and you're right he was #5. Although I still find Sergio's win over Paul a little bit more impressive.

[IronDanHamza]

were are not talking bout duran or camacho here dumb dumb...let's keep it simple....it's between the pwil who fought sergio vs the corrales that fought floyd......the chicho that floyd beat had wins over manfreedy and rbert garcia......the pwill that sergio beat had wins over margo, winky and quintana......is'nt it as clear as day light who was the better fighter between the two?......it should be commone sense but i guess it aint so common ..i have you and the *****s as a proof so far.....lol

The Williams that Martinez fought, fought Margarito over 3 years ago and Quintana over 2 years ago. So why are you still proceeding to use those as examples when they have been shut down numerous times?

I know we not talking about Duran or Camacho, they are known as examples, You know, examples? You understand what an example is?

I will tell you what makes it clear as daylight who was better at the time (emphasis on AT THE TIME) ;

Corales was #1 in the weight class, coming off impressive wins.

Williams was unranked at the weight class, coming off average performances.

There it is in black and white what the better win is. But evidently you struggle to understan basic logic and basic comprehension, this thread shows that much.

That's all there is too it, but I guess your going to respond with a moronic response reiterating your points that have been exposed as false and idiotic.

So go ahead, the thread tells the story. I'm done.

[lefthook2daliva]

Hahahaha!!!! You are the re-incarnation of Goebbels...or his great-grandkid....your poll rivals those of the New York Times. Congratulations! You should apply to the ********ic party!

[IronDanHamza]

Yes, my bad. I just looked it up and you're right he was #5. Although I still find Sergio's win over Paul a little bit more impressive.

That's fair.

I personally lean on Corales.

Both very impressive wins.

[Real King Kong]

The Williams that Martinez fought Margarito over 3 years ago and Quintana over 2 years ago. So why are you still proceeding to use those as examples when they have been shut down numerous times?

I know we not talking about Duran or Camacho, they are known as examples, You know, examples? You understand what an example is?

I will tell you what makes it clear as daylight who was better at the time (emphasis on AT THE TIME) ;

Corales was #1 in the weight class, coming off impressive wins.

Williams was unranked at the weight class, coming off average performances.

There it is in black and white what the better win is. But evidently you struggle to understan basic logic and basic comprehension, this thread shows that much.

That's all there is too it, but I guess your going to respond with a moronic response reiterating your points that have been exposed as false and idiotic.

So go ahead, the thread tells the story. I'm done.

not only that...but imo opinion williams showed he didn't belong at that weight by being hurt numerous times by martinez who wasn't known as a big puncher. he was lucky to come away with a win in their first fight. i thought he lost.