true or false....sergio and floyd
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Clearly you didn't, Because in the year 2000 Corales was P4P #5.
Floyd was #8 P4P in 98 and #2 P4P in 99 BEFORE he fought Corales. Again, do your research as evidently you weren't around the sport then.
Margarito was THREE AND A HALF years before he lost to Martinez. Does that not matter to you? Do you not go off recent form of a fighter?
Do you not read? I have already told you why it's a better win. Corales was looking better than Williams and Corales was ranked on par P4P and higher in his division than Williams was.
There is literally nothing else to say. It's black and white.Comment
-
im calm....i just dont understand how a 2nd round againts a better fighter overall aint better than a 9th round tko over an inferior fighter , that is all...lolComment
-
mofo...it was you who said corrales was # 3 and im the one who was'nt around the sport then...lol,,then all of a sudden he becomes # 5...lol....just admit you did'nt know corrlaes 's place in the p4p at that time.....do you not read, ive already stated that correla never had a better win than pwill's win over sergio, margo or quintana...that should be a common knowledge to boxing fans, i guess you aint........
You also said Floyd wasn't ranked P4P until he fought Corales...which is also false.
Oh my word, again, Margarito was THREE AND A HALF YEARS before he lost to Martinez, chose to ignore that part of my post though right?
Quintana was also 2 and a half years before the Martinez loss.
News flash, this actually matters.
His recent form was 2 average performances....as opposed to Corales who was coming off 3 KO's.
Williams wasn't ranked at 160, Corales was #1 at 130.
Wiliiams was #5 P4P, Corales was #5 P4P.
Thus, Corales was a better win.
If your going to respond and repeat your flawed argument that 'Williams beat Margo, Sergio an Quintana!' Then please, just don't bother.Comment
-
To which I stood corrected as he was #5. Yet your saying he was #9. When in actual fact he was #5.
You also said Floyd wasn't ranked P4P until he fought Corales...which is also false.
Oh my word, again, Margarito was THREE AND A HALF YEARS before he lost to Martinez, chose to ignore that part of my post though right?
Quintana was also 2 and a half years before the Martinez loss.
News flash, this actually matters.
His recent form was 2 average performances....as opposed to Corales who was coming off 3 KO's.
Williams wasn't ranked at 160, Corales was #1 at 130.
Wiliiams was #5 P4P, Corales was #5 P4P.
Thus, Corales was a better win.
If your going to respond and repeat your flawed argument that 'Williams beat Margo, Sergio an Quintana!' Then please, just don't bother.Comment
-
By your logic, Floyd's win over Mosely is a greater victory. Mosely is a better fighter overall than Pwill. Because Sergio lost to Margaritto, Mosely beat Margaritto, Floyd beat Mosely.
You can't look at boxing as This person knocked this person out in two rounds, so its better than someone elses victory over someone else.Comment
-
Thats just looking at the numbers, thats not adding the variables, and the things that surround the fight.
By your logic, Floyd's win over Mosely is a greater victory. Mosely is a better fighter overall than Pwill. Because Sergio lost to Margaritto, Mosely beat Margaritto, Floyd beat Mosely.
You can't look at boxing as This person knocked this person out in two rounds, so its better than someone elses victory over someone else.Comment
Comment