Prince Naseem: hall of fame!

[cklmaced]

Naz did little in the states?

He was one of HBO's premier stars.

Lasting impact since y'all compared him to Tyson ask an american who prince naseem is. I bet 95% wouldn't have a clue.

[Psycho Paul]

Way to fcking own yourself Willard qualifies as an old timer meaning his last bout had to be before 1942.Naz would have to qualify in the modern section.

And ?, you're saying Jess is worthy of the HOF because he fought pre1942 despite what he achieved coming nowhere near what Nas did ?.

Oh okay, **** it people we don't rate on what boxers achieved, if we like them they should be in and if we don't like them but they fought in the 20s, let's have them in as well. Not boxers that actually achieved something and made an impact though, don't be silly.



Answer the question ****, what has Willard got over Nas ?, what do these experts see in him but not Nas.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lasting impact since y'all compared him to Tyson ask an american who prince naseem is. I bet 95% wouldn't have a clue.

Naz had a lasting impact on the sport. Fans of the sport know who he is.

[cklmaced]

And ?, you're saying Jess is worthy of the HOF because he fought pre1942 despite what he achieved coming nowhere near what Nas did ?.

Oh okay, **** it people we don't rate on what boxers achieved, if we like them they should be in and if we don't like them but they fought in the 30s, let's have them in aswell.



Answer the question ****, what has Willard got over Nas ?, what do these experts see in him but not Nas.

Mad that I clowned you and exposed your lack of knowledge. You might as well start getting mad that Stallone is in the HOF. They are different sections just accept your ownage and move on.

[RubenSonny]

He defended his title as well and only lost it cos he got dehydrated in a fight held outdoors in Vegas. A pretty ****** idea in the middle of the summer for an Irish man to fight under those conditions. McGuigan has a good resume too and beat better fighters than Naz did for the most part. The fact that Nas never fought again after that Barrera fight ( not including that one other random guy he faced) shows he didn't have the heart and desire that ATGs do after they lose a fight.

Like who??

[cklmaced]

Naz had a lasting impact on the sport. Fans of the sport know who he is.

So you compared him to Tyson yet accept that most people don't know who he is, so how can his impact be as big as Tyson's? The way im clowing you idiots in this thread I feel like this.

[Psycho Paul]

Mad that I clowned you and exposed your lack of knowledge. You might as well start getting mad that Stallone is in the HOF. They are different sections just accept your ownage and move on.

Can't answer the question then ?.
It doesn't matter if they're old timers or modern, you get in on what you achieved. Do you think every boxer pre 1942 gets in the HOF ?, or do you think they choose specific ones that actually did something. If it's the latter then you agree it's on what you achieved, no ?.

You didn't answer my question previously either, if it's who 'likes' them and not what they achieved, why is let's say Carlos Monzon in the HOF ?.

Find me 1 person that likes his personal life please.

You might have to actually do some research here, you know next to nothing about the sport so I'm guessing you don't know who Monzon is, don't strain yourself doing to much research though, you might hurt yourself.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So you compared him to Tyson yet accept that most people don't know who he is, so how can his impact be as big as Tyson's? The way im clowing you idiots in this thread I feel like this.

Sigh.

His impact on the sport is undeniable.

Tyson being a bigger celebrity is another issue.

You really are slow.

[PrinceNaz88]

So you compared him to Tyson yet accept that most people don't know who he is, so how can his impact be as big as Tyson's? The way im clowing you idiots in this thread I feel like this.

Create a new topic, and ask people if they have heard of Naseem Hamed.

I bet there would be more than 5% (as you say) from American who know who he is for a start..

Where are you from by the way?

[cklmaced]

Can't answer the question then ?.
It doesn't matter if they're old timers or modern, you get in on what you achieved. Do you think every boxer pre 1942 gets in the HOF ?, or do you think they choose specific ones that actually did something. If it's the latter then you agree it's on what you achieved, no ?.

You didn't answer my question previously either, if it's who 'likes' them and not what they achieved, why is let's say Carlos Monzon in the HOF ?.

Find me 1 person that likes his personal life please.

You might have to actually do some research here, you know next to nothing about the sport so I'm guessing you don't know who Monzon is, don't strain yourself doing to much research though, you might hurt yourself.

Did you even look at any of my points? I said if it was a 50/50 decision his personal life would probably be a factor.Personal I have no problem with him being in the HOF just not a shoo-in like some of you do, your points make no sense as they don't relate to Naz section. Why don't you bring up someone in the modern scetion who he should be in ahead of instead of Willard who doesn't relate to Naz being in whatsoever.