Prime Ali vs Prime Wlad

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cupocity303
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2005
    • 9604
    • 752
    • 750
    • 22,038

    #61
    Originally posted by sunny31
    Ali tko mid rounds, very competitive though.

    Anyone that knows boxing knows ali could punch, his and srl power is severely underrated because people chose to focus on their razzle dazzle and other more eye catching attributes.
    Ali TKO mid rounds, against a proven First-Class championship Caliber fighter?

    How many times did a prime Ali go all 15 rounds against guys you and I can't even name, off the top our head without looking at Boxrec?

    He floats like a Butterfly and stings like a butterfly for 15 rounds on ESPN Classic, every other week. I KNOW, I've seen the fights. BORING AS HELL.

    Nothing like Ali vs Cleveland Williams, this is extra effort on Ali's part not the usual.

    Comment

    • SplitSecond
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 23151
      • 1,715
      • 1,187
      • 85,044

      #62
      i can only see this fight being super boring, no one could really land on anyone, i'd lean towards ali because he has more heart and faster hands/flashier combo's can sway the judges, either like that or ali by tko just because wlad tends to fold after being hurt or knocked down

      tough fight for both men

      Comment

      • Joeyzagz
        Soir
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2006
        • 6253
        • 569
        • 567
        • 16,120

        #63
        I dont see Wlad beating any of the past great champions. Maybe 2nd tier guys like Norton, Braddock, Spinks, Patterson, but all the elites take care of him.

        Ali wins TKO 11
        Dempsey wins KO 5
        Joe Louis wins KO 1
        Foreman wins KO 3
        Lennox wins KO2
        Holyfield wins SD 12
        Bowe wins TKO 8
        Vitali wins TKO 10

        All of the above are MULTI-DImensional fighters. Peter was Power and nothing else, Chambers was defense and nothing else. A fighter with multiple attributes beats Wlad. Like Sanders: Speed/Power/Experience.

        Comment

        • Dave Rado
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 8064
          • 266
          • 453
          • 14,460

          #64
          Originally posted by JoeyZagz
          Like Sanders: Speed/Power/Experience.
          Still bringing up the Sanders fight? That has as much relevance to today as Singsurat's win over Pacquiao. Do you judge Lewis on his loss to McCall?

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #65
            Originally posted by cupocity303
            "Too robotic to beat Ali".

            What a simpleton statement, if I ever heard one.

            I suppose George Foreman was also robotic, certainly according to Ali he was. Since he called him a Mummy.

            But could George Foreman dominate fighters for 12 rounds straight just with a jab, basic technical fundamentals and Moderate footwork? Don't worry, I'll answer. NO, he couldn't.
            I think Ali would have control Wlad,once again Wlad is to slow and very robotic..Foreman was dominate because of his power not his skill..He was another one who does not have good foot work Ali was right to call him a mummie(lol)..Wlad has a size advantage and uses it but he is fighting in a HW era that is very weak..It has nothing to due with the date,Lennox fought in the 90's their was better comp inthose days then there is now..Norton Holmes had better skill sets imo and Foreman is a better puncher then Wlad..Do you believe Wlad beats any of these fighters??

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP