I agree that Wlad has fought more opposition, but they aren't necessarily better opposition in my opinion. He doesn't really have anyone on his resume that you can point out and say his wins against so and so should place him ahead of his brother. For all intents and purposes, Lennox is the best fighter in either of the twos resumes. And I think the general consensus was that Vitali was on his way to beating Lewis if it weren't for that freak cut. And if the rematch had taken place (I still hate Lewis for b1tchin out of the rematch), I think Vitali would have clearly won. Also throw in the fact that Vitali was sidelined for 4 years with an injury.
I think the general consensus now in the boxing world is that Vitali is indeed the better fighter between the two, but then again it's really the resumes that determines your place on the list. So you're probably right that Wlad may end up being a few notches higher, but I still think it should be the other way around.
I think the general consensus now in the boxing world is that Vitali is indeed the better fighter between the two, but then again it's really the resumes that determines your place on the list. So you're probably right that Wlad may end up being a few notches higher, but I still think it should be the other way around.
Comment