Should fighters even waste their time fighting hopkins

[Larry the boss]

yea your right, barely beating winky wright at 175 is way better than a ruiz win, for instance

or beating a 36 year old tarver at 175 coming down from heavyweight is better than beating a 34 year old tarver when your coming down from heavyweight, yep

alot of people argue roy lost that first tarver fight..plus hopkins jumped 2 divisions at 40 and beat tarver

[Bushbaby]

so that makes him better than pacquiao and jones?

what do you think is more of a challenge, fighter a smaller guy coming up in weight for the first time, or going up in weight and fighting a bigger guy at his proper weight?

Wow,seriously,U start an argument & then have the nerve to put this in there??The only fighter or champion above 140 that Pacman has beaten at the correct weight was Clottey.Now ur reaching & making urself look foolish.

[SplitSecond]

[/SIZE][/B]

Wow,seriously,U start an argument & then have the nerve to put this in there??The only fighter or champion above 140 that Pacman has beaten at the correct weight was Clottey.Now ur reaching & making urself look foolish.

it was regarding to roy smart ass

[SplitSecond]

alot of people argue roy lost that first tarver fight..plus hopkins jumped 2 divisions at 40 and beat tarver

oh so you think roy lost that first tarver fight?

ok then, i'll make sure to ignore the rest of your posts from here on

[Bushbaby]

Hopkins just proved he is still the best LHW which speaks to how poor and void and real talent the division is at this stage.

I absolutely agree,kinda like 147...............................!!

[Larry the boss]

so that makes him better than pacquiao and jones?

what do you think is more of a challenge, fighter a smaller guy coming up in weight for the first time, or going up in weight and fighting a bigger guy at his proper weight?

correction going up in weight and beating bigger guys at catchweights

[IronDanHamza]

hopkins resume ****s on roy's and it aint even close

Really? How so?

[SplitSecond]

why do you idiots think i was talking about pacquiao when pacquiao has clearly not fought the bigger guys at the proper weight? why?i know you know i was obviously talking about roy jones, unless you are just beyond ****** people

incase you hadn't noticed it is roy jones/manny pacquiao vs bernard hopkins

the top 3 of the era, greatest is obviously manny, but i'd like to see dibushbaby's arguement for why bhop is "clearly" the greatest of the era

[Bushbaby]

it was regarding to roy smart ass

Besides Tito & Oscar were already middleweight champions when B-Hop beat them.Oh,did I forget that he was also unified & undisputted as well??Just threw that in there for ****s & giggles.U may not like it,but there is valid argument for considering B-Hop as the greatest of the current active fighter.My opinion is that he is,urs obviously isn't,but my argument is valid,just like urs is.That's why I said arguably,don't get mad,it is what it is.

[Walterson]

wasn't calzaghe fighting a 40 year old hopkins that had been inactive for roughly a year? or am i wrong lol ...

fact that calzaghe struggled to get past him proves why he don't get credit

furthermore, the fact that he wasn't up for a rematch says it all ..