IMO theres no difference cuz its for a vacnt belt, but I do think it wa against better competition at the time, I was looking at Hattons record today and A LOT of his opponents have negative win records, or a lot of losses ( not that losses are career ending but man)
IMO theres no difference cuz its for a vacnt belt, but I do think it wa against better competition at the time, I was looking at Hattons record today and A LOT of his opponents have negative win records, or a lot of losses ( not that losses are career ending but man)
Let's not forget that this title is at a catchweight too. I really wish dudes would stop doing this crap. SMH
Cotto never fought a former undisputed welterweight champion before he got a title shot. I know that doesn't mean much since it was Baldomir but still the overwhelming majority of contenders get moved into position for a title shot in almost the exact same way Alverez is.
IMO theres no difference cuz its for a vacnt belt, but I do think it wa against better competition at the time, I was looking at Hattons record today and A LOT of his opponents have negative win records, or a lot of losses ( not that losses are career ending but man)
yeah bro,Thats the way sum fighters win there belt.Cotto won the vacant
belt and defended it against good comp.Lets hope canelo goes that exact
route,No need to rush him.
Comment