Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I'll Fight Mayweather, The Fans Want It

[AFighter4U]

Who cares ?

It is a joke that you attack Mayweather in order to defend Manny.

e.g.
Manny did so and so..... "yea but Floyd....."

So, Mayweather set's the standard for Manny ?

You must rate Mayweather higher than I do then.

How does your blame-diverting get Manny off the hook ?

typical.

"who cares?"

that's you're response? i guess when you're proven wrong, that's your usual reaction.

you rant about cotto not agreeing to fighting at catchweight, yet conveniently omit the fact that he agreed to it later on.

you rail on about how pac fought at catchweight, making it sound like pac invented the practice, yet ATG's fought at catchweight and so do a number of fighters.

i didn't divert the blame to floyd. i merely pointed out in spite of your obvious close-mindedness, the boxing world is rife with examples of great fights at catchweight, many of them participated by ATGs. you seem only to be fixed on Pacman for some reason and hold him to a standard you do not apply to ANYBODY ELSE. that's plain idiocy right there. but if you insist on thinking that way, then i won't deny you your right to do so.

How does it change the fact that the "new" and "improved" Pacquiao's best win is over a guy who was faded, shop-worn, had just been battered by cheato and Clottey, had no trainer, was not on top of his game, and most definitely was not in his prime?

hey, i won't deny you your obviously biased point of view. if you want to see things that aren't there, then i won't deny you your hallucinations.

You quote an exception by Mayweather, and ignore the rule by Pacquiao.

Manny is making a living fighting old men and plodders.

That example is absurd.

ohhh. so its alright to cheat and fight with odds ridiculously in your favor as long as its exception eh? suit yourself man.

Manny won't fight in his own division without a catch-weight, and at JMW, he won't fight at all..... and then you compare him to Martinez?

Martinez isn't the b1tch calling for catch-weights, he knocks those clowns out

Lol! pac fought a total of 57 fights. and of all those fights he fought at catchweight TWICE. He's fighting mosley now at guess what? NOT AT A CATCHWEIGHT.

YOU are the one confusing the exception with the rule here.

and you're saying he won't fight at his division without a catchweight? dude. your bias is just so obvious, its pitiful.

i didn't compare pac to martinez. i merely mentioned the man as an example of catchweights not being a deal breaker and that fighting at a catchweight does not automatically mean you are at a significant disadvantage that you cannot win.

martinez is a perfect example why catchweights isn't the obstacle you make it out to be since he himself fought at a catchweight he didn't want to do so in the first place yet he won.

if you still can't see that, then its your loss.

[xcaret v3]

take the test... simple.

[EL_cano]

take the test... simple.

even if he (pac) did take the test, floyd will be M.I.A.

[ADP02]

I challenge you to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate.....

Originally Posted by LeadUppercut

The only ww that Manny has EVER fought at 147 is..... Josh Clottey.

Mayweather fought Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley..... I don't count Hatton or Marquez as WW.

So, let's summarize.....

Above 147.....
Manny fought faded no-wraps cheato at catch-weight, Floyd fought Hoya at 154 when he was champ, no comparison there.

At 147.....
Clottey, who wouldn't fight back for some reason, and Cotto at 145..... is not as good as Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, Hatton, and Marquez at 147.

And btw, don't give me "soon"

And I am not interested in your boy's exhibition match's, so don't try to insinuate that Manny fought Cotto at welterweight, because that didn't happen.

What, Manny is now " surprised " that his chicken-**** girly catch-weight demand impacted negatively on that fight?

FKN HARD LUCK !!

And what did you expect, really ?

Just like I thought, you wouldn't respond to my post.

As for your challenge, as stated below:
You said: "I challenge you to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate....."

I will start with you not mentioning that Manny fought Oscar at 147.

and to refute Cotto fight at 145 where it was only Manny's 2nd fight at 147 PLUS Manny never came in at 147 during his weigh-in, is lame. Plus Cotto weighed in at 146 in his previous fight!!! Like I said, just lame on your part.

IF FLOYD FOUGHT COTTO AT 145, we would NOT be criticizing Floyd, the way we do. I hope you will one day get it!

[rambov]

61 pages and no race card yet.... we're movin on up!

[mikemurni]

Kid.....

For THE SEVENTH TIME.....

I challenge you to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate.....

Originally Posted by LeadUppercut

The only ww that Manny has EVER fought at 147 is..... Josh Clottey.

Mayweather fought Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley..... I don't count Hatton or Marquez as WW.

So, let's summarize.....

Above 147.....
Manny fought faded no-wraps cheato at catch-weight, Floyd fought Hoya at 154 when he was champ, no comparison there.

At 147.....
Clottey, who wouldn't fight back for some reason, and Cotto at 145..... is not as good as Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, Hatton, and Marquez at 147.

Don't duck me son, man up.

----------------------------------------------------

That's all you gotta do kid, just answer the question.....

I challenge you to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate.....

Waiting.....

I guess, running out of things to say, hey...

Refute what?? That you are ******ed. I am not gonna do that because I agree..

There is nothing in that post that is new that has not been refuted.

[ronnie_N.]

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

fight won't happen......

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[LeadUppercut]

typical.

"who cares?"

that's you're response? i guess when you're proven wrong, that's your usual reaction.

NO, " who cares " because your point was irrelevant.

I even spelt it out for you, you dishonest clown.

You replied to my post, and attempted to defend Manny (is that what you were doing?) by simply attacking Mayweather, and not even attempting to address those issues.

e.g.
Manny did so and so..... " yea but Floyd..... "

I will say again, who fkn cares what vacationer does, are Manny's standards determined by another man? If so, that would make him a b1tch.

you rant about cotto not agreeing to fighting at catchweight, yet conveniently omit the fact that he agreed to it later on.

No, you dishonestly missed the point, yet again.

You often do that, which is why I have called you a dishonest cvnt on a number of occasions now.

The poster that I replied to insinuated that Cotto " happily agreed " to the catch-weight demand. He fkn did not, and you know it.

Obviously he fought Cotto, so obviously Cotto eventually conceded.

It's just easier for me to write you off as dishonest

Why would you quibble over something like that kid ?

you rail on about how pac fought at catchweight, making it sound like pac invented the practice, yet ATG's fought at catchweight and so do a number of fighters.

FACT: Any title won at catch-weight, is worthless. Don't fkn list them for me you moron, yes, yes, Ray as well, totally fkn useless, clearly he is not a genuine LHW champ *sigh*

I am gonna have to wipe your arse all the way through your ****ty post, aren't I?

The " new " and " improved " Pacquiao, has made an art-form out of fighting opponents who were at a considerable disadvantage, including both catch-weight fights. Every single opponent since before Marquez has a question mark hanging over them. Coincidence? Yea right.

i didn't divert the blame to floyd. i merely pointed out in spite of your obvious close-mindedness, the boxing world is rife with examples of great fights at catchweight, many of them participated by ATGs. you seem only to be fixed on Pacman for some reason and hold him to a standard you do not apply to ANYBODY ELSE. that's plain idiocy right there. but if you insist on thinking that way, then i won't deny you your right to do so.

Bull**** kid, you did so.....
"how quickly you forget the floyd himself fought at a catchweight against a smaller, older, fatter foe"

hey, i won't deny you your obviously biased point of view. if you want to see things that aren't there, then i won't deny you your hallucinations.

Biased? You mean " experienced "? Wake up kid.

ohhh. so its alright to cheat and fight with odds ridiculously in your favor as long as its exception eh? suit yourself man.

What, do you mean like using steroids? Or demanding a catch-weight against your opponent's wishes?


Lol! pac fought a total of 57 fights. and of all those fights he fought at catchweight TWICE. He's fighting mosley now at guess what? NOT AT A CATCHWEIGHT.

He wouldn't fight Shane even WITH a catch-weight you wally, Pac turned him down TWICE until he saw that he was shot, same as when he signed Cotto from ringside. Perhaps you shouldn't have mentioned Shane?

YOU are the one confusing the exception with the rule here.

and you're saying he won't fight at his division without a catchweight? dude. your bias is just so obvious, its pitiful.

FACT: The ONLY ww that Manny has EVER fought at 147, is Clottey.

i didn't compare pac to martinez. i merely mentioned the man as an example of catchweights not being a deal breaker and that fighting at a catchweight does not automatically mean you are at a significant disadvantage that you cannot win.

So fkn what? What does that have to do with a fair contest, or the spirit of competition, or what is best for the sport? Take your $5 whore standards, and weak excuses, and keep them to yourself, don't try to hand me that rubbish, I am a boxing fan.

martinez is a perfect example why catchweights isn't the obstacle you make it out to be since he himself fought at a catchweight he didn't want to do so in the first place yet he won.

You are a fkn idiot for telling me that I should accept catch-weights because "so and so won"... MORON..... Manny should NOT demand a catch-weight, because plenty of fighters manage to win without one.

Two-faced standards

" if you still can't see that, then its your loss "

You talk absolute ****, blindly defending Manny at all costs, no matter what. Sorry kid, I can't take you non-boxing fan's too seriously.

[LeadUppercut]

even if he (pac) did take the test, floyd will be M.I.A.

How would you know that ?

You don't even have the foresight to reply to my post.

Did you just make that up ?

Or was that just a ..... guess ?

Or are you simply exerting the power of positive thinking ?

I cannot imagine why somebody who actually wanted to see that fight would take your position. That makes no sense at all.

So, you have no problem at all with Manny killing that fight by refusing to submit to random blood testing without a 24-day cutoff, because..... you "guess" that Mayweather will be MIA?

Unbelievable

[LeadUppercut]

Just like I thought, you wouldn't respond to my post.

As for your challenge, as stated below:
You said: "I challenge you to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate....."

I will start with you not mentioning that Manny fought Oscar at 147.

and to refute Cotto fight at 145 where it was only Manny's 2nd fight at 147 PLUS Manny never came in at 147 during his weigh-in, is lame. Plus Cotto weighed in at 146 in his previous fight!!! Like I said, just lame on your part.

IF FLOYD FOUGHT COTTO AT 145, we would NOT be criticizing Floyd, the way we do. I hope you will one day get it!

Great point, I did to, well done man.

***tards, ooops, I mean, *******s.....

This man did, what you ALL failed to do, and he did it successfully.

Smarten up kids.

Thnx ADP.

But *** off with your lame $5 whore standards, when you said this.....

"and to refute Cotto fight at 145 where it was only Manny's 2nd fight at 147 PLUS Manny never came in at 147 during his weigh-in, is lame. Plus Cotto weighed in at 146 in his previous fight!!! "

Blah, blah, blah, whine..... manny small, blah, blah..... feel sorry for pac, blah, blah.... let him away with it, blah, blah.

So.....

Revised edition, thnx to ADP02, because I forgot to include old, shot-to-****, weight-drained, 145lb two weeks before the fight, 145lb at weigh-in, 145lb on fight-night, shrink-wrapped, De La Hoya..... because, that's REALLY gonna make a difference

==============================

I challenge ANYBODY to refute anything in my post that is even slightly inaccurate.....

Originally Posted by LeadUppercut

The only ww that Manny has EVER fought at 147 is..... Josh Clottey.

Mayweather fought Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley..... I don't count Hatton or Marquez as WW.

So, let's summarize.....

Above 147.....
Manny fought faded no-wraps cheato at catch-weight, Floyd fought Hoya at 154 when he was champ, no comparison there.

At 147.....
Clottey, who wouldn't fight back for some reason, faded Cotto at 145, and shrink-wrapped Hoya..... is not as good as Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, Hatton, and Marquez.