Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I'll Fight Mayweather, The Fans Want It
Collapse
-
Bull**** kid, I did no such thing.
Mr fkn boxing expert - NOT -
.....
You do not have the knowledge, nor the insight, nor the right, to state that the weight manipulation used against Cotto had no adverse effect.
And, you dishonest prick, what I stated was that I DO NOT CARE whether the weight-drain tactics used by Pacquiao had any effect or not, because.....
just because the bullet missed, did not lessen the intent.
Manny ATTEMPTED to drain Cotto, because the catch-weight was completely unnecessary due to the fact that Manny had already fought at 147.
Just more dribble and whiney excuses from Manny's chief fluffer
Comment
-
I didn't understand what you meant there, clarify if you feel it has value.
I do not give a **** about that fight unless it is held at 140.
If Manny demands that Marquez jump TWO DIVISIONS to 147, then you and I are going to become real good friends
you can count on that.
Comment
-
If Pac out-weighs JMM by more than 5 pounds during fight night, then you can probably compare it to what Mayweather did to JMM. But everyone knows that come fight night, their weights won't be that far apart.I didn't understand what you meant there, clarify if you feel it has value.
I do not give a **** about that fight unless it is held at 140.
If Manny demands that Marquez jump TWO DIVISIONS to 147, then you and I are going to become real good friends
you can count on that.Comment
-
And unless floyd finds his balls, he'll have to put up with the cowardice accusations.Keep it real.
Manny had his chance, but he preferred to offer 6 ridiculous excuses.
And now, the vacationer has to drop what he's doing because Pacquiao made a "promise" to the media?
Hard luck for him. He can put up with the steroid accusations until Mayweather get's his **** together.Comment
-
Its funny that you are calling me whiny considering I am not the one making up all this excuses.. I am not here 24/7 bickering the same issue everyday like you do..Bull**** kid, I did no such thing.
Mr fkn boxing expert - NOT -
.....
You do not have the knowledge, nor the insight, nor the right, to state that the weight manipulation used against Cotto had no adverse effect.
And, you dishonest prick, what I stated was that I DO NOT CARE whether the weight-drain tactics used by Pacquiao had any effect or not, because.....
just because the bullet missed, did not lessen the intent.
Manny ATTEMPTED to drain Cotto, because the catch-weight was completely unnecessary due to the fact that Manny had already fought at 147.
Just more dribble and whiney excuses from Manny's chief fluffer
And you do?? At least I am not here claiming that Cotto was weight drained. In fact I am not the one using the weight as an excuse for this fight or any of his fights. Like as if that 1 lb was the reason why he got pounded on by Pac for 10 of the 12 rounds..
Just for argument sake, if you dont care so much about whether the catchweight had any effect on Cotto, then why the hell keep bringing it up as if it matters.
The fact is Cotto agreed to it, and personally said before and after the fight that the weight didnt affect him at all. Its really pathetic you are givin all this excuses when the fighter himself (Cotto) never utter a single complain about the weight, you whiny b!tch..Last edited by mikemurni; 02-17-2011, 06:29 PM.Comment
-
Anyone who knows anything about boxing would NEVER use fight-night weight as a determining factor for ANYTHING !!
The amount of muscle-mass and conditioning that you will take into the fight is solely determined by how you fare at the weigh-in, not by your rehydration weight.
That is boxing 101, plain and simple.
Anybody who states otherwise is either dishonest or ignorant.Comment
-
Comment
-
Funny how Floyd and his posse keep talking about tests, while the other parties talk about the fight. If you don't want something, there's always an excuse.
Comment
-
Bull**** kid. Cotto most definitely did not agree to it.At least I am not here claiming that Cotto was weight drained. In fact I am not the one using the weight as an excuse for this fight or any of his fights. Like as if that 1 lb was the reason why he got pounded on by Pac for 10 of the 12 rounds..
I did not claim that Cotto was weight-drained.
I claimed that Margarito and Clottey had both battered Cotto. EVERYBODY was saying that Cotto looked shop-worn and faded after Clottey. Miguel was not on top of his game, he had no trainer to speak of, and he most definitely was not in his prime...... plus, Pacquiao ATTEMPTED to drain him on the scales, which was a b1tch-move, because Pac had already fought at 147.
Give yourself an uppercut.
Just for argument sake, if you dont care so much about whether the catchweight had any effect on Cotto, then why the hell keep bringing it up as if it matters.
Because whiney ****s like you keep trying to insinuate that "Cotto is better than.....". So, I am just pointing out that you are full of ****.
It is a joke that Cotto is the "new" and "improved" Pacquiao's best win, considering that he was shop-worn and faded, had no trainer to speak of, and he most definitely was not in his prime..... plus, Pac tried to drain him
The fact is Cotto agreed to it, and personally said before and after the fight that the weight didnt affect him at all. Its really pathetic you are givin all this excuses when the fighter himself (Cotto) never utter a single complain about the weight, you whiny b!tch..
Cotto stated "147 if you want my title, or a non-title fight if you need a catch-weight"..... But oh no, as usual, Manny won't fight unless he has a distinct advantage.
Have all of your " whine's " been addressed now ?Comment
Comment