Tweet
The look in Roach's eyes is priceless. Dont try to read his face, he has parkinsons. Look at his eyes, lol!
-
-
You could have the first and last word, wouldn't change squat. Run along, clown. You and your dumb friends want Tim Smith to give up his sources so you can feel better. Then try to rationalize why its ok for Manny to sue GBP for talking, and not a journalist for something even more damaging. Please, don't make me laugh. Too late.
Comment
-
What? Journalistic duty?
R U zhyting me? It's your duty to verify if true not just "believing" before you report.
Next time don't open your mouthy, u know nothing about journalism.Comment
-
no, no its not. its your duty as a journalist not to report stuff as fact that might not be true. and tim smith did not report anything as a fact. smh...u guys dont even understand the law on libel and yet u post ur inaccurate information on the site.
the law does not work the way u think it should! it works the way its written and interpreted(by the courts) to work.Comment
-
I sure Tim peed on himself. Manny should've confronted him, but he(Tim) isn't worthy enough to shine Manny's shoes.Last edited by Carpe Diem; 02-15-2011, 12:24 PM.Comment
-
anonymous sources have been used on a regular basis by writers to hide the fact that they dont have solid proof or corroborated evidence.
You're nothing but a ******* pretending to be a real journalist asian sensation.Comment
-
All one has to do is google Anonymous Sources & see countless articles & opinions about how Anonymous Sources are maliciously used by writers & how often wrong Anonymous Sources information are.
From the oj simpson case to newsweek having to retract a story about the koran being flushed down the toilet, to the l.a. times artilce that had to be retract about puffy combs beating up tupac shakur,
Almost all prominent anonymous sources ARE PROVEN INCORRECT.
The foudner of usa today Al Neuharth wrote a article titled: Evil of Journalism; Anonymous Sources.
some highlights;
It's so simple. Most anonymous sources often tell more than they know. Reporters who are allowed to use such sources sometimes write more than they hear. Editors too often let them get away with it. Result: Fiction gets mixed with fact.
The only way to win the war against this evil is for journalists at all levels to ban all anonymous sources.
From wikipedia;
The identity of anonymous sources is sometimes revealed to senior editors or a news organization's lawyers, who would be considered bound by the same confidentiality. (Lawyers are generally protected from subpoena in these cases by attorney/client privilege.) Legal staff may need to give counsel about whether it is advisable to publish certain information, or about court proceedings that may attempt to learn confidential information. Senior editors are in the loop to prevent reporters from fabricating non-existent, anonymous sources, and to provide a second opinion about how to use the information obtained, how or how not to identify sources, and whether other options should be pursued.
Here's a article about the post banning anonymous sources by the amercian journalism review;
Anonymous Sources are used maliciously by many writers with no concrete fact. They hide behind the journalism edict of protecting anonymous sources from being taken to task if what they are writing is dishonest & inaccurate.
So take with a grain of salt that ny daily news article by tim smith & propagandized by drunk *****holic burner. Somebody could have said that, but that needs to be corroborated. The mayweather camp could have said it as a pr ploy to further defame pacquiao only to hide behind the anonymous sources shield.
tim smith might be a honorable man, but he's covering a very dishonorable profession were its led by crooked nefarious human beings. There's a good chance he was played/ used as a pawn by somebody from GBP or team mayweather & was told about those fraudulent ass emails.
If that email was true it would have been leaked by now.Comment
-
LOL!! After all that explanation, you still can't figure out the difference between source and proof......LMAO! Ayay.You could have the first and last word, wouldn't change squat. Run along, clown. You and your dumb friends want Tim Smith to give up his sources so you can feel better. Then try to rationalize why its ok for Manny to sue GBP for talking, and not a journalist for something even more damaging. Please, don't make me laugh. Too late.
Comment
Comment