Pacquiao visited Tim Smith's office (email accuser), Smith was nowhere to be found?

[JOM'S]

here is Tim's article on the meeting, no mentioned of anything damning, maybe a sign of washing his hands or just sweeping what he did under the rug....

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more_sports/2011/02/15/2011-02-15_manny_pacquiao_visits_daily_news_offices_in_town_with_shane_mosley_to_promote_ma.html?r=sports

[AFighter4U]

LOL!! After all that explanation, you still can't figure out the difference between source and proof......LMAO! Ayay.

he's a perfect example of how some people simply live in their own reality no?

[Crazylegs77]

Lets just say Pac isnt Tims "kind of fighter"

[AFighter4U]

Lets just say Pac isnt Tims "kind of fighter"

Lol! Nice one!

[Carpe Diem]

Oh Lord. Please buy a mirror. *******s. SMH.

Hey, watch your mouth!

[brick wall]

no, no its not. not even in the legal sense is the burden of proof always with the accuser. u dont kno wat ur talking about.

it's you who have no idea of what you talking about. i'm not a lawyer but i took up some units in law in college and that's a basic premise. if you accuse somebody make sure you can back it up otherwise don't make the accusation. this world will be in great chaos if we have to follow your dumbass logic.

with that said, if he has an inside source, someone who he knows works on the inside of these negotioations as he said, why the hell would he doubt this source??? most, if not all journalists in this country do the same thing. the only reason u guys have a problem with it is because he worte an article critical of ur superstar. grow up and understand how the media in this country works.

idiot...even in courts of law, somebody's testimony is the least acceptable evidence because humans by nature is capable of lying. and what he got was a 2nd hand information...his source could be lying...or even the author himself was lying. he wrote that there was an email...then by all means provide the email. if there was a sender for sure there was a recipient. the alleged recipient was on the other side of the fence so for sure he's more than glad to help provide the email. so how hard is that? unless such email didn't really exist. it's just common sense moron but you don't have it.

im tired of u little kids who seem to think the world works in the way u think it should. it doesnt. this is nothing new, and it definitely isnt going anywhere. smith is a well known reporter. if he says he has an inside source, he has one. was the info accurate? who knows...i didnt hear anyone but arum come out and say anything about it annnnd, i have yet to hear them launch any suit against smith or his source for defamation. that tells me a lot.

this world works well without ****** people like you that's for sure. who cares if smith is a well known reporter...that doesn't mean he can't make up ****. and who cares if he has claimed to have an inside source or not? that doesn't prove anything. it's all about the email...where is it? he wasn't talking about the weapons of mass distruction in iraq...it's just an email. that's the easiest proof that can be provided in this times if indeed it exist. the problem is if it doesn't.

[brick wall]

I see ******s here asking for the email or proof, Its not like they going to believe the so call email even if they print it, Even the email isnt proof of anything so why ask to see it?

wow you're a dumbass...if it isn't a proof why even bother to write about it?

[brick wall]

no, no its not. its your duty as a journalist not to report stuff as fact that might not be true. and tim smith did not report anything as a fact. smh...u guys dont even understand the law on libel and yet u post ur inaccurate information on the site.

the law does not work the way u think it should! it works the way its written and interpreted(by the courts) to work.

then why are you suggesting that pac should've sued his ass?

[Ray*]

wow you're a dumbass...if it isn't a proof why even bother to write about it?

Why bother write it? Wow you are really dumber than i thought, "I would be praying for you"

[jpunieves]

if floyd can poke everyone in the face... imagine what a gentleman pacquiao will do to him.