Pacquiao visited Tim Smith's office (email accuser), Smith was nowhere to be found?

[Mr. Ryan]

no one here is fighting the media. just expecting a certain degree of professionalism, that's all.

i'm sure Smith is a decent human being and a great writer to be working for such an illustrious outfit. It simply means the man slipped up this one time. Its only human.

I never said he couldn't have been mistaken. We all make mistakes.

[AFighter4U]

Oh I get it. I get that you can't refute anything I said. Thank you.

of course i can't refute you if all you say is utter nonsense. And your welcome!

[AFighter4U]

I never said he couldn't have been mistaken. We all make mistakes.

never said you did man. i just mentioned that he simply was being human.

[AFighter4U]

what a dumbass logic...burden of proof always lies with the accuser not the accused. and no, he doesn't need to name his source but he can definitely provide the subject of his article. his source told him there was an email...did he see it before he wrote his article? if he saw it he can provide it. or maybe he just relied completely on what his source told him...if that's what happened then that's what you can call unethical and irresponsible journalism.

i couldn't have said it better myself.

[breezy53]

So Tim Smith went from "Nowhere to be found" to right there at the meeting? Damn pac supporters are just ******s sometimes

[IMDAZED]

of course i can't refute you if all you say is utter nonsense. And your welcome!

Nothing I said was false. So either refute it or shut up.

[IMDAZED]

So Tim Smith went from "Nowhere to be found" to right there at the meeting? Damn pac supporters are just ******s sometimes

They are either teens or just cornballs to the highest. It's amazing really. Do these people have real jobs?

[Kagami Taiga]

what a dumbass logic...burden of proof always lies with the accuser not the accused. and no, he doesn't need to name his source but he can definitely provide the subject of his article. his source told him there was an email...did he see it before he wrote his article? if he saw it he can provide it. or maybe he just relied completely on what his source told him...if that's what happened then that's what you can call unethical and irresponsible journalism.

no, no its not. not even in the legal sense is the burden of proof always with the accuser. u dont kno wat ur talking about.

with that said, if he has an inside source, someone who he knows works on the inside of these negotioations as he said, why the hell would he doubt this source??? most, if not all journalists in this country do the same thing. the only reason u guys have a problem with it is because he worte an article critical of ur superstar. grow up and understand how the media in this country works.

im tired of u little kids who seem to think the world works in the way u think it should. it doesnt. this is nothing new, and it definitely isnt going anywhere. smith is a well known reporter. if he says he has an inside source, he has one. was the info accurate? who knows...i didnt hear anyone but arum come out and say anything about it annnnd, i have yet to hear them launch any suit against smith or his source for defamation. that tells me a lot.

[AFighter4U]

Nothing I said was false. So either refute it or shut up.

nonsense is neither false, nor true dude. its just nonsense. utter drivel and therefore, i'm not wasting any more time with you on this matter. you can have the last word since i noticed it seems to be an obsession for you as well.

[Ray*]

I see ******s here asking for the email or proof, Its not like they going to believe the so call email even if they print it, Even the email isnt proof of anything so why ask to see it?