Now that is the real point, and the huge fly in the ointment as far Greenburg's statement is concerned. In the next post I will quote an old reply to the same question.....
I hold two points.....
1.) Bob Arum lied, that is not even debatable, he was forced to admit it.
2.) Greenburg was most likely manipulated by Uncle Bob, but had motive, and could have lied to cover Arum. His obscure statement was hardly overflowing with information.
Either way..... there were no " negotiations ". It is impossible for official negotiations to have taken place during the two weeks that preceded Arum's bull**** "deadline" with GBP, or during the following 24 hours that led up to Arum's conference call.
I hold two points.....
1.) Bob Arum lied, that is not even debatable, he was forced to admit it.
2.) Greenburg was most likely manipulated by Uncle Bob, but had motive, and could have lied to cover Arum. His obscure statement was hardly overflowing with information.
Either way..... there were no " negotiations ". It is impossible for official negotiations to have taken place during the two weeks that preceded Arum's bull**** "deadline" with GBP, or during the following 24 hours that led up to Arum's conference call.





.....
Comment