He should have that belt already, instead the disgraceful WBA ruled that Chagaev's title was not on the line and then they stripped him after the fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko: We Won't Retire Without Haye's Belt!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by shade darkar View Postlol, ok your showing yourself to be a nuthugger now. I never knew wlad held all four major titles.
I'll leave it at that, cheers brother.
Comment
-
Haye is a paper champion. You can't dispute, argue, or name call that away unfortunately.[/QUOTE]
Wow what a resume Wlad has stacked up to earn those titles. How many world class fighters has he beaten in that time?
You could argue that Wlad is the paper champion, seeing as he only took over after vitali was out of the ring injured. Who was at that point recognised as the number 1 after lennox.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boxing Scene View PostCome on. We all know what happened with Chagaev. You know he was the legitimate champion when Wlad beat him.
I'll leave it at that, cheers brother.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Scene View PostCome on. We all know what happened with Chagaev. You know he was the legitimate champion when Wlad beat him.
I'll leave it at that, cheers brother.
Briggs wins a vacant belt (wbo) which underlines the atrocity that is the heavyweight division...
Valuev wins a vacant belt and in both cases Haye and Wlad beat both guys after they had 1 title defence. But yes one was a paper champion and the other was a legitimate win because it suits your cause...right! Dude just go your embarrassing yourself further with every second you spend here
Comment
Comment