Comments Thread For: Pacquiao Could Target Berto's Title in The Near Future
Collapse
-
-
I remember arum saying he has no issues with al haymon.
Comment
-
Mayweather has 7 fights since stepping up to 147 & Pacquiao only 5 so it's an offbase comparison at best. Also, Bruseles was @ 140 and Sharmba was his stepping stone @ 147.Uh Manny hasn't fought Mosley yet. The comparison at the 147 ww max is:
Zab, Brussels, Hatton, Mosley vs. Clottey.
Now if you want to expand it we can. As to who they fought after they 1st fought at 147
ODh (154), Hatton (147), Mosley (147), JMM (146) zab, baldo, brussels v. Clottey (147), Marg (151), Cotto (145), Hatton (140), ODH (147)
ANy way you cut it floyd's is better.
But here's your comparison:
Mayweater vs. Pacquiao vs.
Odh even Odh
Hatton even Hatton
Mosley lost to Cotto Cotto
Judah lost to Clottey Clottey
Baldo would lose to Margarito
Jmm 0-1-1 to Pacman
Sharmba insert Mosley after 5/7
The way I cut it Pacman has the better competitionComment
-
im done arguing and leaving this thread with a puzzle.
Pac fought Cotto, Clottey, Margarito and now Mosley
Margarito fought Cotto, Clottey, Shane and Pac
Cotto fought Margarito, Clottey, Shane and Pac
Clottey fought Cotto, Margarito and Pac
Shane fought Cotto, Margarito, Floyd and now Pac
Floyd fought Shane.
Can you find the kitty cat?
@ 9:00
Comment
-
Pac doesnt need the bankrupt wbc belt. Berto has never sold a PPV in his life. Pac should fight who brings in the most $$$$$$$$.Comment
-
I agree that Berto, my choice over JMM and Mosle after Margarito fight, to be Pac's next opponent. Maybe Team Pacquiao is just waiting for Berto to get more fan base to get good ppv sell.Comment
-
Are you bugging? Catchweights and fighters coming off bad performances,struggling or loses? Floyd only fought twice at WW and is still #1 in the division. Your seriously wilding! Floyd dominated 130, fought tougher comp at 135, more at 140 and became the Lineal champion at WW technically twice because of the Mosley win. Pac only fought guys that had name value. Cotto (catchweight), Clottey (coming off a lose). If Pac resume was better at WW than Floyd's, then Pac would have been #1. Right or wrong? Just off of the strength that Manny is fighting Mosley after Floyd did, closes the case.My dude, Pac's resume>>>Floyd's, even at WW which is sad. Has nothing to do with popularity. Cotto, Margarito, and Mosley are the premier welters of their era and in a few months, Manny will be able to say he crushed all of them, not 1, not 2, all 3 so that whole 'well, he fought the loser of...' won't fly because he has ALL of them on his record in 1 1/2 years and Floyd has only Mosley in his 6 year WW campaign so what the **** are you on? Manny's career is not even done and he'll have the chance to possibly add Berto and maybe even a record-breaking (his own) 5th lineal championship.
So take it easy
Comment
-
Carlos Baldomir was the Lineal Champion, by beating the Undisputed
WW champion (Zab Judah at the time). Cotto, Clottey and Margarito
NEVER became Lineal champ. No way Pac's resume exceeds Floyd at
WW. Name wise, yeah but status wise, NOPE!Comment
-
No he didn't, Chop chop was solid not bad for a 140 debut, Bruseles? C'mon...Gatti was worn and was carefully matched prior to Floyd.Are you bugging? Catchweights and fighters coming off bad performances,struggling or loses? Floyd only fought twice at WW and is still #1 in the division. Your seriously wilding! Floyd dominated 130, fought tougher comp at 135, more at 140 and became the Lineal champion at WW technically twice because of the Mosley win. Pac only fought guys that had name value. Cotto (catchweight), Clottey (coming off a lose). If Pac resume was better at WW than Floyd's, then Pac would have been #1. Right or wrong? Just off of the strength that Manny is fighting Mosley after Floyd did, closes the case.
Lets not exaggerate his run at 140.Comment
-
Neither one of them were better than Cotto though at the time. Now the Mosley win yea for sure. The win against Judah TBH was just as good as the Clottey win...Comment
Comment