Bernard Hopkins at it again: "The Klitschko Brothers Are "Just Lucky"
Collapse
-
-
So what if he picked David Haye to beat the Klitschkos? He's Golden Boy, Haye is Golden Boy, of course he's going to pick Haye. Further, is Hopkins alone in thinking that? Nope! Lennox Lewis for example thinks Haye beats them both.
Going even further, is it false to say the klitschko's are lucky that they are in a weak heavyweight era? Lot's of people believe this. It is absolutely 100% correct that the heavyweight division is horrible right now. This is non-disputable. Have the Klits benefited from this weak division? Absolutely!Last edited by ИATAS; 01-26-2011, 01:45 PM.Comment
-
Last edited by Vadrigar.; 01-26-2011, 01:54 PM.Comment
-
Wladimir Klitschko (49 KOs in 55 wins) and Vitali Klitschko (38 KOs in 41 wins) are the two most dominant heavyweight champs of all time.
All of the best black heavyweights have been dominated, humiliated and destroyed by the Klitschkos.
Either Klitschko beats any black HW from any era.Comment
-
i don't care how many midgets hopkins beats, or how many racist statements he makes, his nutthugging excuse machine will defend him mercilessly...Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Come on -- he's said plenty about race.
He already said blacks are "genetically superior athletes."
So when he dimisses the Klitschkos as "lucky," of course it's about race.
To dismiss what they've achieved as mere "luck" is outrageous.Comment
-
Tito was knocking the **** out of genuine 160s and people pretty much figured he was a natural 154-160er all along and finally didnt have to cut so much weight. Nobody doubted by the time he stepped in with Hopkins that he was too small, and in fact most predicted he'd smash Bhop flat too. BHop defeated him with pure sublime skill and conditioning. Tito lost because he got hit like a punching bag and couldnt touch Hopkins.
You have Hagler in your avatar. Hmm..... Roberto Duran?Comment
Comment