Comments Thread For: Chisora: I Found Wladimir's Weaknesses, I'll Exploit Them

[WladIsTheChamp]

I agree with you there.

Chisora is likely the lightest hitter that Wlad has been in with ever since he became a champion.

He's not a big-puncher for a heavyweight. He hit Sexton an awful lot and with everything he had. He was teeing off on him to be fair.

65% is not a light hitter but it's not a particularly big hitter either. It's good power that Wlad should respect but I think even if Chisora gets to Wlad's chin, Wlad will weather the storm.

[Sparked_1985]

Not true, Byrd wasn't a big hitter and Chambers has a 50% KO ratio I think.

Yeah, I thought about them.

I think they both probably hit harder than Chisora and have KO's at a higher-level.

Obviously, it's all speculation. I'm not being hit by Chisora. It just looks that way to me.

[pacmanis1]

Everyone knows a fight isn't exciting unless it ends in a KO, that's why the Gatti/Ward fights ******, it went to decision.

Sorry but so many ****** things have already been said in this thread I felt the need to add one more.

[Steak]

bah, Chisora has less of a chance of beating Wlad than John Ruiz.

[ChopperRead]

Are you for real? Tyson was shot and old and in his last fight vs McBride. A prime Tyson would have knocked McBride the **** out easy.

You're missing the point.

[nordic]

War Chisora. It's for the best of boxing if he wins. Klitschko is the most boring heavyweight champion of all time, even more boring than Lewis and Holmes. Atleast Lewis was in a few exciting fights.

I'm a boxer (not a pro.. yet) myself and I can't do nothing but admire Klitschko's. They are efficient and they has been dominating the hw division for several years. The result is everything that really counts so I don't give a **** to those who call them boring. You don't think in the ring about the style you are doing it, you just think about winning!

[ChopperRead]

I'm a boxer (not a pro.. yet) myself and I can't do nothing but admire Klitschko's. They are efficient and they has been dominating the hw division for several years. The result is everything that really counts so I don't give a **** to those who call them boring. You don't think in the ring about the style you are doing it, you just think about winning!

Calling an athlete "boring" over and over again is the last resort of the hater (and also pretty damn boring itself).

Anyone who is great and who dominates his era completely or almost completely is going to get called "boring."

I found Roger Federer boring when he was beating everyone in sight, but I also knew he was arguably the best tennis player who ever lived.

Still, I prefer to watch Rafael Nadal, because he plays a more physical brand of tennis. And if it gets to the point where Nadal is beating everyone in sight (which it has, pretty much), that may get boring as well.

So when they call Wlad boring, it is really a compliment. It means that Wlad is a completely dominant champion and there is really little that you can say he's doing wrong. His style may not be to everyone's taste, but in the end, who cares?

He's a winner and the numbers are on his side.