The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #291
    Originally posted by Walt Liquor
    This Is Beyond ridiculous.

    Ring bylaws state that in certain cases, 1 vs 3 can determine the champ.

    The ring hasn't even announced what they're gonna do.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with having Devin at #3.

    Kotelnik beat maidana and lost a close decision to Alexander. I thought Kotelnik won, but it's not out of the ordinary for judges to put too much weght on thrown punches vs landed punches. Plus maidana lost to khan. I don't think there's anyone else you could logically put over Alexander right now.

    Which other fights are you crusading against that were scored differently than you or the majority of observers thought?
    Its funny you all thought Alexander lost his last fight yet you still somehow claim he deserves to fight for the vacant Ring Belt.

    Sorry i cant get past such backwards arse logic.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #292
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Its funny you all thought Alexander lost his last fight yet you still somehow claim he deserves to fight for the vacant Ring Belt.

      Sorry i cant get past such backwards arse logic.
      I don't think people are saying he "deserves" to fight for the Ring title. We're saying if he beats Bradley he becomes the #1 fighter in the division.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #293
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        Dodging the answer is more like it.
        No you failed to answer. Im asking who he beat to become the man. Which fight against which fighter made him the man?

        I shouldve known i wouldnt get an answer from you.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #294
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          No you failed to answer. Im asking who he beat to become the man. Which fight against which fighter made him the man?

          I shouldve known i wouldnt get an answer from you.
          You got an answer, you just didn't like it. In this era there wasn't any man to take the title from. It happens. Happened to Virgil Hill, happened to Bernard Hopkins. By virtue of having the best resume, they were dubbed number one. Bradley is the top guy in the division and very few disagree.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #295
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            You got an answer, you just didn't like it. In this era there wasn't any man to take the title from. It happens. Happened to Virgil Hill, happened to Bernard Hopkins. By virtue of having the best resume, they were dubbed number one. Bradley is the top guy in the division and very few disagree.
            Bernard Hopkins beat everyone around him at middleweight to become the man. And it took him almost a decade.

            Bradley has done nothing like that. Laughable comparison.

            Comment

            • Walt Liquor
              the opposite of pure
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 21667
              • 913
              • 1,369
              • 40,313

              #296
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Its funny you all thought Alexander lost his last fight yet you still somehow claim he deserves to fight for the vacant Ring Belt.

              Sorry i cant get past such backwards arse logic.
              Let me make this a little clearer for you.

              Alexander got a w in his last fight. That's what goes in the record books. There's not asterisk that says Dirk and walt thought he lost.

              By virtue of his resume at 140, which includes a win over kotelnik, he certainly isn't a reach at #3 ranked jww in the world.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #297
                Originally posted by Walt Liquor
                Let me make this a little clearer for you.

                Alexander got a w in his last fight. That's what goes in the record books. There's not asterisk that says Dirk and walt thought he lost.

                By virtue of his resume at 140, which includes a win over kotelnik, he certainly isn't a reach at #3 ranked jww in the world.
                I'll never find it clear how you can watch a guy lose and then say he should get to fight for the Ring Belt

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #298
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  Bernard Hopkins beat everyone around him at middleweight to become the man. And it took him almost a decade.

                  Bradley has done nothing like that. Laughable comparison.
                  Bernard was considered the man as far back the middle nineties.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #299
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Bernard was considered the man as far back the middle nineties.
                    When did he win the Ring Belt?

                    Comment

                    • jaskieee
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 686
                      • 13
                      • 123
                      • 7,107

                      #300
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Yeah and he was the only one.

                      Stop it.
                      You have your opinion. No one else is going to convince you that Devon Alexander is worthy of the Ring belt because your too blinded by your love of Amir Khan. There is nothing wrong with that, its good to be a passionate fan but at the end of the day thats what it comes down to.

                      By the same token your not going to convince anyone other than Khan groupies that Bradley-Alexander should NOT be for the Ring belt. So maybe you should 'stop it'.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP