The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #261
    Originally posted by Ko King 212
    You must be on the payroll. There is no way somebody would go back and forth with people for 26pgs because you don't Agee that they should be fighting for the ring title.

    Either that or you are f-ckin Kahn.
    Nah i just actually have a coherent argument.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #262
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      Makes what legit? You could be an opponent fresh off a loss and fight a guy for a title and, guess what? If you win you have his belt. Same applies to the #1 title in the division. If you beat the man, you are the man. You know, like when Hopkins moved up to 175 and beat Tarver fresh off two losses? This has happened many times in boxing.
      Yeah but...once again....Bradley is not the Man.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #263
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Yeah but...once again....Bradley is not the Man.
        That's your opinion, Dirk. Doesn't make it true.

        Comment

        • The Gambler1981
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 25961
          • 520
          • 774
          • 49,039

          #264
          Dedicated to the cause I will give you that.

          If Khan was involved I wouldn't mind if the ring belt was on the line either though. To me I would rather get that belt in play so people know who the champ is. I would hope Khan would get a shot at it right away and it kind of makes sense that he would.

          Still don't see this as being a huge issue.
          Last edited by The Gambler1981; 01-11-2011, 09:44 PM.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #265
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            That's your opinion, Dirk. Doesn't make it true.
            So whats your opinion? Oh yeah....you never give one.

            Comment

            • IMDAZED
              Fair but Firm
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2006
              • 42644
              • 1,134
              • 1,770
              • 67,152

              #266
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              So whats your opinion? Oh yeah....you never give one.
              Maybe you never read. I have no problem stating that Bradley is the best fighter at 140 and thus, the man. I have no problem with the Ring title being on the line though I doubt it happening. I have Bradley #1 and really don't have a #2. I do think Bradley's biggest threats are Khan and Alexander. And I do believe that if either of them were to beat him, they should be considered the "man" in the division.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #267
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                Maybe you never read. I have no problem stating that Bradley is the best fighter at 140 and thus, the man. I have no problem with the Ring title being on the line though I doubt it happening. I have Bradley #1 and really don't have a #2. I do think Bradley's biggest threats are Khan and Alexander. And I do believe that if either of them were to beat him, they should be considered the "man" in the division.
                What exactly makes Bradley "the man" at 140? He didnt beat Hatton when he was on top. He never beat Pacquiao. So who exactly has he beat to be the man at 140?

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #268
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Maybe you never read. I have no problem stating that Bradley is the best fighter at 140 and thus, the man. I have no problem with the Ring title being on the line though I doubt it happening. I have Bradley #1 and really don't have a #2. I do think Bradley's biggest threats are Khan and Alexander. And I do believe that if either of them were to beat him, they should be considered the "man" in the division.
                  I feel that, it is always better when there is a recognized champ what order those guys fight in I don't care but the title should be at stake.

                  Comment

                  • The Gambler1981
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 25961
                    • 520
                    • 774
                    • 49,039

                    #269
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    What exactly makes Bradley "the man" at 140? He didnt beat Hatton when he was on top. He never beat Pacquiao. So who exactly has he beat to be the man at 140?
                    He is the most proven?

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #270
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      Dedicated to the cause I will give you that.

                      If Khan was involved I wouldn't mind if the ring belt was on the line either though. To me I would rather get that belt in play so people know who the champ is. I would hope Khan would get a shot at it right away and it kind of makes sense that he would.

                      Still don't see this as being a huge issue.
                      Ok so would you accept Khan fighting Petersen for the Ring belt? I mean the winners are gonna fight anyway right?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP