The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

[americanbot]

dirk is complaining about alexander having a close fight with koltilnik & now he some how thinks bradley vs alexander is a fraud match up....WHOOHAHAHAHA.

his logic is ****ed because maidana had a RAZOR close fight with chop chop corley. maidana went on to fight khan afterwards but yet he didn't call that fight a fraud match up. he praised it.

i believe that both alexander & maidana may have over looked their opponents in those cases.

dirk doesn't understand that fighters give their ALL when they think they are in the ring with the best opponent of their life.

dirk is lost whoooohahahaha.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You have your opinion. No one else is going to convince you that Devon Alexander is worthy of the Ring belt because your too blinded by your love of Amir Khan. There is nothing wrong with that, its good to be a passionate fan but at the end of the day thats what it comes down to.

By the same token your not going to convince anyone other than Khan groupies that Bradley-Alexander should NOT be for the Ring belt. So maybe you should 'stop it'.

It has nothing to do with Khan. I just dont think a guy who lost his last fight should get to fight for the vacant Ring Belt.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

dirk is complaining about alexander having a close fight with koltilnik & now he some how thinks bradley vs alexander is a fraud match up....WHOOHAHAHAHA.

his logic is ****ed because maidana had a RAZOR close fight with chop chop corley. maidana went on to fight khan afterwards but yet he didn't call that fight a fraud match up. he praised it.

i believe that both alexander & maidana may have over looked their opponents in those cases.

dirk doesn't understand that fighters give their ALL when they think they are in the ring with the best opponent of their life.

dirk is lost whoooohahahaha.

You're the only one acting like those 2 fights were the same because you need something to excuse Alexander getting schooled by Kotelnik.

[americanbot]

You're the only one acting like those 2 fights were the same because you need something to excuse Alexander getting schooled by Kotelnik.

dirk is lost......


the point flew right over your head. both alexander & maidana had close fights leading up to bradley/khan.

why call one match bull****. but ignore the other side. & even PRAISE the other side (that being the khan madaina side)

in that case. khan maidana was a fraud match up.....because maidana had just fought corely in a fight that could have gone ether way.

this is your logic......

[Dirk Diggler UK]

dirk is lost......


the point flew right over your head. both alexander & maidana had close fights leading up to bradley/khan.

why call one match bull****. but ignore the other side. & even PRAISE the other side (that being the khan madaina side)

in that case. khan maidana was a fraud match up.....because maidana had just fought corely in a fight that could have gone ether way.

this is your logic......

Alexander vs Kotelnik and Maidana vs Corley were not the exact same fight no matter how desperately you try to convince yourself they were.

[americanbot]

your logic is ****ed dirk.

and the sad thing is you can't even see it.....

not cool

[Dirk Diggler UK]

your logic is ****ed dirk.

and the sad thing is you can't even see it.....

not cool

My logic is that the two best guys in the division should fight for the Ring Belt. That currently being Khan and Bradley.

Your logic is that a guy you thought lost his last fight should fight for The Ring Belt.

Yeah i think i'll take my logic.

[IMDAZED]

When did he win the Ring Belt?

The "Ring" belt wasn't reinstated as a "belt" until well into Hopkins' reign. Maybe even longer - around the turn of the century.

[americanbot]

My logic is that the two best guys in the division should fight for the Ring Belt. That currently being Khan and Bradley.

Your logic is that a guy you thought lost his last fight should fight for The Ring Belt.

Yeah i think i'll take my logic.

now you're switching your stance. i thought alexander lost a close decision. i also thought the corely maidana fight was a toss up (reviewing it again I'm leaning towards it being a loss for maidana) all in all both fights were close leading up to khan/bradley.

if alexander can beat bradley he's number 1 in till khan fights him. if bradley beats alexander theres no questions that bradley is the king in till khan can prove otherwise.

[jrosales13]

The "Ring" belt wasn't reinstated as a "belt" until well into Hopkins' reign. Maybe even longer - around the turn of the century.

Very true, The Ring went bankrupt late 80's/early 90's and then reinstated their policies again like 2000/01

But, for the majority of majority of the 90's they weren't any Ring champions.

At the end I don't get what the big deal is. Is the ring rankings they go by their rankings and their rules. It states #1 could fight the #3 rank for the title if it is approved. And, if they approve it so be it. They're not breaking their rules or making one up in the fly.

Would I consider the winner the lineal champ? Nah, cuz' I think Khan should be in the discussion. I personally think right now he has a better resume at 140 then Alexander does. I thought Alexander lost his last fight against Kotelnik. Would that change if Alexander beats Bradley? Yes depending on how he does it.

I have no problem with the winner of Bradley-Alexander being the #1 JWW. But, I think Khan vs the winner will fill the vacancy of the lineage in that division. However, as for the ring title that is fine. Nothing wrong with it.