Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Vitali Klitschko a top 10 heavyweight of all time?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
    Then make that case, the point was don't bring up KO% cuz it means nothing. I repeat KO% means nothing so need to bringing it up cuz it a ****** ass point.

    Is about competition faced.

    Do you get it now? Or are you too slow to get it?
    Talking to the ****** klit-ites is like talking to a wall. They don't understand simple facts such atg lists being judged by resume and other **** that is COMMON KNOWLEDGE.

    It doesn't matter how many times they bring up KO%, or that Vitali hasn't been knocked down, or that he had the longest layoff and then came back to win a title or whatever.... ITS ALL ABOUT RESUME. THE REST OF THE **** DOES NOT MATTER. And guess what Vitali's resume SUCKS, it down right stinks for a so called great heavyweight.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Tyson. View Post
      No it doesnt.

      If that was the case how comes Mayweather and Hopkins have the best ring IQ, in boxing today ?
      Well Hopkins is a crafty survivor and is very smart, despite being a racist old-lady robbing felon, so his reputation for being smart is well deserved, he does play chess by the way just like the Klitschkos. Oh and ol Popkins is very smart with his money and saves every penny of it, you will never see him broke.

      No Money on the other hand, well his ring IQ is not that great, I think it's his athletic talents that pull him through but there is a reason why he won't fight the best, Popkins does fight the best though.

      But neither of these guys dominate like the Klitschkos do, the Klitschkos don't loose rounds, period. Hopkins has a ton of losses and sc****s by on SDs half the time. Mayweather is also content on running the entire time and getting an MD/SD. The Klitschkos have way more ring IQ or any other IQ than either of these two.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cousin Vinny View Post
        Talking to the ****** klit-ites is like talking to a wall. They don't understand simple facts such atg lists being judged by resume and other **** that is COMMON KNOWLEDGE.

        It doesn't matter how many times they bring up KO%, or that Vitali hasn't been knocked down, or that he had the longest layoff and then came back to win a title or whatever.... ITS ALL ABOUT RESUME. THE REST OF THE **** DOES NOT MATTER. And guess what Vitali's resume SUCKS, it down right stinks for a so called great heavyweight.
        Then the other idiot wants to bring up Kick Boxing and give Vitaly extra credit cuz this is his 2nd sport.'

        Comment


        • Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View Post
          Well Hopkins is a crafty survivor and is very smart, despite being a racist old-lady robbing felon, so his reputation for being smart is well deserved, he does play chess by the way just like the Klitschkos. Oh and ol Popkins is very smart with his money and saves every penny of it, you will never see him broke.

          No Money on the other hand, well his ring IQ is not that great, I think it's his athletic talents that pull him through but there is a reason why he won't fight the best, Popkins does fight the best though.

          But neither of these guys dominate like the Klitschkos do, the Klitschkos don't loose rounds, period. Hopkins has a ton of losses and sc****s by on SDs half the time. Mayweather is also content on running the entire time and getting an MD/SD. The Klitschkos have way more ring IQ or any other IQ than either of these two.
          bet ya if i fought my 4 yo niece, i won't be losing any rds either.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by etlux View Post
            damn right he's top 10. in fact he's #1 of all time
            Why should people take ******s like you seriously after dumbass posts like this?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View Post
              Well Hopkins is a crafty survivor and is very smart, despite being a racist old-lady robbing felon, so his reputation for being smart is well deserved, he does play chess by the way just like the Klitschkos. Oh and ol Popkins is very smart with his money and saves every penny of it, you will never see him broke.

              No Money on the other hand, well his ring IQ is not that great, I think it's his athletic talents that pull him through but there is a reason why he won't fight the best, Popkins does fight the best though.

              But neither of these guys dominate like the Klitschkos do, the Klitschkos don't loose rounds, period. Hopkins has a ton of losses and sc****s by on SDs half the time. Mayweather is also content on running the entire time and getting an MD/SD. The Klitschkos have way more ring IQ or any other IQ than either of these two.
              To quote Roger Mayweather: You dont know shit about boxing

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Frogs! View Post
                bet ya if i fought my 4 yo niece, i won't be losing any rds either.
                Vitaly might not lose rounds but he lost 2 fights against the best competition he has ever faced.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JoeyZagz View Post
                  Im saying weight does not matter as much as you sisters claim it does. Ali would beat Vitali 9 times out of 10. His lower weight would actually be an Advantage not a hindrance.

                  We all know that the previous Lennox era was far superior than this current Fat/unskilled/ era. All Klitscko losses occured against members from this era.

                  Wlad lost to a man with 20 losses from the superior era ...thats how good the fighters were.....

                  Yet it was Ali who was the bigger man in his fights most of the time (in fact more so than the disparity between Klitschkos and their opponents, look it up on boxrec if you don't believe me), Ali was a super HW of his time, at 6'3" and 200+ he was bigger than most HWs of his era. So don't talk to me about size, when he faced "Big" George Foreman, they were both the same weight and Ali was taller than Foreman. Size + skill matter a great deal. A good big man will always beat a great little man.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                    Vitaly might not lose rounds but he lost 2 fights against the best competition he has ever faced.


                    vitali has never "lost" a fight remember?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View Post
                      Well Hopkins is a crafty survivor and is very smart, despite being a racist old-lady robbing felon, so his reputation for being smart is well deserved, he does play chess by the way just like the Klitschkos. Oh and ol Popkins is very smart with his money and saves every penny of it, you will never see him broke.

                      No Money on the other hand, well his ring IQ is not that great, I think it's his athletic talents that pull him through but there is a reason why he won't fight the best, Popkins does fight the best though.

                      But neither of these guys dominate like the Klitschkos do, the Klitschkos don't loose rounds, period. Hopkins has a ton of losses and sc****s by on SDs half the time. Mayweather is also content on running the entire time and getting an MD/SD. The Klitschkos have way more ring IQ or any other IQ than either of these two.
                      That's because Mayweather and Hopkins fight's alot better competition than Wlad. what's next, are you gonna tell me Samuel Peter and Shannon Briggs where as good p4p wise as Jean Pascal or Shane Mosley?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP