Originally posted by etlux
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Vitali Klitschko a top 10 heavyweight of all time?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostThe only slow one is you. If you think just the KO% is important irrespective of the weight class then me bringing up Vitaly's kick-boxing career is very relevant to our discussion, since your logic is about as good as 2 year old's with autism.
This post proves that you're slow since you can't see the difference
So try again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostActually no, Mock, the guy who knocked Diva down, has fought as low as 158 as a pro...so you were saying?
We all know that the previous Lennox era was far superior than this current Fat/unskilled/ era. All Klitscko losses occured against members from this era.
Wlad lost to a man with 20 losses from the superior era ...thats how good the fighters were.....
Comment
-
It's funny as hell seeing the dumbass klit-ites who don't know **** about boxing make one ******ed statement after the other, and then get picked apart.
I saw one of these klit-ites claim Samuel Peter and Arreola where better than Ken Norton and Tim Witherspoon in another thread, and in this one they are claiming Vitali is a top 10 hw of all time based and knockout percentages and other delusional ****.
ATG LISTS ARE BASED ON RESUME, nothing else, it's not could have, should have, would have, ITS WHAT YOU ACTUALLY DID... It doesn't mean **** if you think Vitali could beat Ali or whoever. Fact is his resume and accomplishments doesn't get anywhere near to being deserving of a top 10 place.
Comment
-
Originally posted by etlux View Postit ain't bout the title it's bout the competition. valero has none.
valero's ko percentage is not superior to vitali's because he only fought 27 fights. at 27 fights vitali's ko percentage was identical i.e. 100%. that means most likely if valero would have fought on obviously it would have went down as vitali's did.
in short,
Vitali owns Valero and you
Comment
-
Originally posted by etlux View Postyes actually it does because it makes him smarter in the ring than most of the dumbass wild swinging murderers that you and your alts idolize
If that was the case how comes Mayweather and Hopkins have the best ring IQ, in boxing today ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by etlux View Postyes actually it does because it makes him smarter in the ring than most of the dumbass wild swinging murderers that you and your alts idolize
Comment
-
i'll be dang. a fair pole on one of the klitmo's.
so use to tunney/carnivore/kid lavigne and his downsyndrome crew
starting thier hoaky klit polls then putting peeps that don't agree on ignore
that this is a breath of fresh air.
Comment
Comment