A fighter coming off from a loss. Do you believe on this crap?

[Canelo Phresh]

ts is a *******. pac was undeniably great in his super feather weight days but light weight through welter weight has been carefully directed.

[damned1974]

Paul Williams' next opponent will be expected to win based on
****** idiots' theory. You'd wonder why promoters still had to
make such fights happen. Training and long hours of preparation
mean nothing according to these ****** idiots' assumptions. I'm
glad I'm not into this ****** theory and I can still enjoy boxing
as it's always been.

So make no mistake. If P Will loses in his next fight, no credit will
be given to his opponent. Otherwise, his opponent gotta be one
of the weakest fighters in the world. See how ****** it is?

I would say,unless William's next opponent is a complete bum,I would not bet money on William's.Too much to lose and there will be question marks over him after that ko....that is the kind of ko that can change a fighter.That is why these fighters normally don't fight elite competition directly after a severe ko-it is negligent to the fighter's safety.

[jonesroy]

If I have to explain this again after a series of posts,then I give up.Re-read my previous posts,maybe then you will understand....or maybe you will still be in denial and believe in your "that's just an excuse" theory to glorify some of Pac's pattern picked opponents.For me and many others,there is a definite pattern of opponent and circumstances with them-only a fool cannot see it.

I don't know why you keep going back to Pac. Why do all these threads get infested with Pac/Floyd haters? I was hoping you could explain your point of view w/o sounding like a psychologist/lawyer; in other words, a point of view based on something concrete like a fighter's age, size, or speed, and not things like heart or mental state.

[damned1974]

ts is a *******. pac was undeniably great in his super feather weight days but light weight through welter weight has been carefully directed.

I agree.Pac's earlier career outweighs his current career imo.It seemed less paved and he appeared more eager to fight anyone out there....nowadays his career has more protection than birth control!

[damned1974]

I don't know why you keep going back to Pac. Why do all these threads get infested with Pac/Floyd haters? I was hoping you could explain your point of view w/o sounding like a psychologist/lawyer; in other words, a point of view based on something concrete like a fighter's age, size, or speed, and not things like heart or mental state.

Pac has the perfect list of opponents that relate to this subject.In fact,they are consecutive.I doubt it is a coincidence.

My friend can tell you from his direct experience training and helping boxers... but then again,you would still fail to believe him as well (he has been affiliated with elite fighters whom I won't name).

Again-go back and read my previous posts that you have obviously neglected to read,since you didn't respond to them.I don't feel like parroting myself too much longer to people who can't seem to let things "sink in".

[damned1974]

ts is a *******. pac was undeniably great in his super feather weight days but light weight through welter weight has been carefully directed.

LOL-be careful-the "*******s won't notice that you complimented Pacquiao-they only notice negativity being directed towards his recent fights and get agitated!

[jonesroy]

Pac has the perfect list of opponents that relate to this subject.In fact,they are consecutive.I doubt it is a coincidence.

My friend can tell you from his direct experience training and helping boxers... but then again,you would still fail to believe him as well (he has been affiliated with elite fighters whom I won't name).

Again-go back and read my previous posts that you have obviously neglected to read,since you didn't respond to them.I don't feel like parroting myself too much longer to people who can't seem to let things "sink in".

Everyone here seems to have a friend who's in the business. As for Pac's "careful selection" of opponents, this is just stuff people come up with AFTER Pacquiao wins. We all knew Oscar was old and therefore would be weight drained against Pac, but we still picked Oscar to win. It was Pac that came up 2 weight divisions. And Hatton was the top fighter at 140, not exactly a safe choice. Cotto was arguably the best fighter after Mayweather at 147 and many of the experts felt Pac was in over his head choosing to fight Cotto. People also come up with excuses to dismiss Mayweather's victories. Some are valid - Mosley was old - but could Marquez and Hatton have beaten the 135/140 version of Floyd? It would be more competitive, but would they have actually won?

[PACnPBFsuck]

I don't know why you keep going back to Pac. Why do all these threads get infested with Pac/Floyd haters? I was hoping you could explain your point of view w/o sounding like a psychologist/lawyer; in other words, a point of view based on something concrete like a fighter's age, size, or speed, and not things like heart or mental state.

You gotta remember that the first post used Pac and Froch as examples.

[jonesroy]

You gotta remember that the first post used Pac and Froch as examples.

I know, but I don't understand why every post becomes about dismissing Pac/Floyd's accomplishments instead of actually discussing the thread's topic.

[Cash Cow]

Is it jealousy OR racism? Or are you claiming both?

I guess the ****'s were jealous of the ***s. The KKK are jealous of the Blacks.

they really are tho. They are upset they are forced to live in the ****tiest most lonely, poverty stricken places in America. They are upset that blacks escaped from Slavery and turned around and changed the landscape of America in only 60 years. Plus they are upset we took over basketball, baseball & football!!