Manny Should Just............

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #51
    Originally posted by Squizz
    I thought THAT MUCH was obvious. But evidently, I'm the ******. UUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMKAY.
    No, although this back and forth name-calling is ******ed. The bottom line is, yes we know Manny Pacquiao doesn't have to do that. But why wouldn't he? It's a question a lot of fans don't want to know the answer to.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #52
      Originally posted by -pound4pound-
      he said 7 days was ok...Floyd went on vacation


      what can you do? it would have been a great call on a bluff if Floyd wanted to fight
      Floyd going on vacation doesn't mean anything. He was on vacation when the Mosley fight was signed so that's highly irrelevant. Secondly, why does Manny Pacquiao not want to do full testing?

      Comment

      • Squizz
        Banned
        • Jun 2010
        • 1982
        • 87
        • 97
        • 2,133

        #53
        Originally posted by -pound4pound-
        actually i do..i think you're the one that's lost

        you: why doesn't PAC take OST in his next fight?
        me: because he doesn't have to

        then you got mad

        you: that's not good enough, he should do it to back floyd into a corner
        me: that's not gonna guarantee floyd manning up and fighting him, he'll just say 'i fight when i wanna fight'

        then you got more mad


        see where we're going with this?


        you're a ****** and all your comebacks get shot down

        it was a weak question to begin with
        So because he doesn't have to is suffice? That's it? That's acceptable to you? He should not have to clear his name despite a myriad of speculation cast over his name? So let me guess: Richard Nixon shouldn't have had to prove his innocence during the Watergate.................ah PHUCK IT. You would have no idea what I was talking about anyhow. You know what? I think all the other posters here can clearly see just based on grammar alone, who the true ****** is in this debate. You are going on my ignore list. You simply don't have the intelligence to debate with me. I am far and away superior to you (probably in every aspect of life in general) in terms of posting capability. You're not on my level son, so I refuse to speak to you. Come back when you have something other than "You're ******ed" to add to the conversation. Until then, STAY THE PHUCK out of my threads. You are not wanted here.

        Comment

        • -MAKAVELLI-
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 50080
          • 3,580
          • 2,792
          • 169,000

          #54
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Floyd going on vacation doesn't mean anything. He was on vacation when the Mosley fight was signed so that's highly irrelevant. Secondly, why does Manny Pacquiao not want to do full testing?


          full testing? you mean year-round testing?

          or the summarized testing that stopped at 18 days for the Shane fight?

          Comment

          • -MAKAVELLI-
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 50080
            • 3,580
            • 2,792
            • 169,000

            #55
            Originally posted by Squizz
            So because he doesn't have to is suffice? That's it? That's acceptable to you? He should not have to clear his name despite a myriad of speculation cast over his name? So let me guess: Richard Nixon shouldn't have had to prove his innocence during the Watergate.................ah PHUCK IT. You would have no idea what I was talking about anyhow. You know what? I think all the other posters here can clearly see just based on grammar alone, who the true ****** is in this debate. You are going on my ignore list. You simply don't have the intelligence to debate with me. I am far and away superior to you (probably in every aspect of life in general) in terms of posting capability. You're not on my level son, so I refuse to speak to you. Come back when you have something other than "You're ******ed" to add to the conversation. Until then, STAY THE PHUCK out of my threads. You are not wanted here.


            i figured i'd make your ignore list...nice owning you...take care kiddo

            Comment

            • Spray_resistant
              Vacant interim regular(C)
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 29609
              • 2,972
              • 1,565
              • 53,384

              #56
              Originally posted by Squizz
              Yeah, like Shane Mosley, right? Fail.
              You mean that 1 time when he took some time out from being the greatest vacationer in the world?

              Comment

              • -MAKAVELLI-
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 50080
                • 3,580
                • 2,792
                • 169,000

                #57
                Squizz,


                you want me to show you HOW to use the ignore feature?

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #58
                  Originally posted by -pound4pound-
                  full testing? you mean year-round testing?

                  or the summarized testing that stopped at 18 days for the Shane fight?
                  Year-round testing isn't full testing. Testing is done at the discretion of WADA and not EVERY sport is year-round. So I don't know what you're talking about there.

                  Second, there is a difference between knowing when tests will stop and not knowing. A big one. As in...the main difference. So I'm not even sure where you're going with that "puga-type" argument. Come on, man.

                  Comment

                  • Squizz
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 1982
                    • 87
                    • 97
                    • 2,133

                    #59
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    No, although this back and forth name-calling is ******ed. The bottom line is, yes we know Manny Pacquiao doesn't have to do that. But why wouldn't he? It's a question a lot of fans don't want to know the answer to.
                    Hey. I wouldn't have resorted to it. You know that DAZED. But with these people, it's the only language they understand. Like I posted earlier, it should be pretty evident based purely on my vocabulary, and grammar just who the ****** is. This guy probably hasn't graduated from high school for God's sake. He is intellectually inferior, and he, you, and I all know this. Yet he HAS to defend his hero when the question is brought up. No matter how logical it is. I'm not going to roll over and play dead. Phuck that. These ****-suckers don't understand anything else. You should know that by now. That's why I don't see you around here so much anymore. It's pointless even TRYING to debate with these fools. And who gets left out in the fray? Posters like you and myself. It's been this way FOR MONTHS DAZED. And you know it. These people simply are not true boxing fans. They're just on the Pacman bandwagon.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Squizz
                      Hey. I wouldn't have resorted to it. You know that DAZED. But with these people, it's the only language they understand. Like I posted earlier, it should be pretty evident based purely on my vocabulary, and grammar just who the ****** is. This guy probably hasn't graduated from high school for God's sake. He is intellectually inferior, and he, you, and I all know this. Yet he HAS to defend his hero when the question is brought up. No matter how logical it is. I'm not going to roll over and play dead. Phuck that. These ****-suckers don't understand anything else. You should know that by now. That's why I don't see you around here so much anymore. It's pointless even TRYING to debate with these fools. And who gets left out in the fray? Posters like you and myself. It's been this way FOR MONTHS DAZED. And you know it. These people simply are not true boxing fans. They're just on the Pacman bandwagon.
                      Well, I do agree that they definitely don't want to discuss Manny's fear of full testing. I wouldn't either if I was a Pac fan. Actually, that's not true so I don't know.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP